Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 4;23(3):304–308. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_425_20

Table 2.

Intergroup comparison among various groups with Tukey post hoc test and P value associated with each comparison

Group Groups P
NaOCl without agitation (Group I) Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) 1.000
Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) 1.000
Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) 1.000
Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group V) 0.000*
Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) NaOCl without agitation (Group I) 1.000
Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) 1.000
Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) 1.000
Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group-V) 0.000*
Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) NaOCl without agitation (Group I) 1.000
Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) 1.000
Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) 1.000
Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group IV) 0.000*
Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group-IV) NaOCl without agitation (Group I) 1.000
Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) 1.000
Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) 1.000
Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group V) 0.000*
Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group-V) NaOCl without agitation (Group I) 0.000*
Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) 0.000*
Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) 0.000*
Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) 0.000*

*Statistically significant P<0.05. SD: Standard deviation, NaOCl: Sodium hypochlorite