Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Feb 4;11:3022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82622-5

Photons detected in the active nerve by photographic technique

Andrea Zangari 1, Davide Micheli 2, Roberta Galeazzi 3,, Antonio Tozzi 4, Vittoria Balzano 5, Gabriella Bellavia 6, Maria Emiliana Caristo 7
PMCID: PMC7862265  PMID: 33542392

Abstract

The nervous system is one of the most complex expressions of biological evolution. Its high performance mostly relies on the basic principle of the action potential, a sequential activation of local ionic currents along the neural fiber. The implications of this essentially electrical phenomenon subsequently emerged in a more comprehensive electromagnetic perspective of neurotransmission. Several studies focused on the possible role of photons in neural communication and provided evidence of the transfer of photons through myelinated axons. A hypothesis is that myelin sheath would behave as an optical waveguide, although the source of photons is controversial. In a previous work, we proposed a model describing how photons would arise at the node of Ranvier. In this study we experimentally detected photons in the node of Ranvier by Ag+ photoreduction measurement technique, during electrically induced nerve activity. Our results suggest that in association to the action potential a photonic radiation takes place in the node.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Neuroscience, Neuronal physiology, Action potential generation

Introduction

Neural communication represents one of the most complex functions of biological systems. Signaling between cells and organs, either by proximity or across a distance, is essentially accomplished through a multitude of biochemical mechanisms. Although such communication mechanisms are ubiquitous in cellular systems, including nervous system, what trivially characterizes nervous cell is that its function is communication itself. Key features of neurotransmission are speed, synchrony and the amount of information transfer. An explanation of such properties required to consider a form of energy transfer emerging from, but not limited to, molecular contact and interaction. The fundamental theory formulated by Hodgkin and Huxley explains the basic mechanism of neurotransmission by a sequential activation of local ionic currents1. Since what are usually referred to as electrophysiological phenomena are ultimately electromagnetic in nature, this theory not only provides a sound explanation of an important physiological mechanism, but also opens up the possibility of providing new contributions to neuroscience by resorting to more comprehensive electromagnetic approaches. In the last decades research gradually began to deal with the implications of electromagnetic fields generated by brain activity, both as a whole and at the level of individual cells27. In particular, electromagnetic waves in the optic and infrared range, have been attracting growing attention for their possible role in neural communication810. The presence of photons during neural activity was experimentally demonstrated by optical detection11 and more recently by a technique of in situ biophoton autography, based on the principle that ionic Ag+ in solution precipitates as insoluble Ag granules when exposed to light12. Recent studies have put forward possible explanations of such experimental evidence. Kumar et al. have speculated that myelinated axon may behave like an optical waveguide13,14. Liu et al. reported myelin sheath as a way for dramatic speed enhancement of signal propagation in nerves in the THz-infrared range15. Jingjing Xu et al. mimicked the myelin sheath structure in myelinated axons16. They showed a clear confinement effect for the energy flux of transmitting electromagnetic waves inside a dielectric tube, strongly supporting the model of soft material waveguide. Zuoxian Xiang, et al., reported a primary model of THz and far-infrared signal generation and conduction in neuron systems17. Song et al. reported relatively strong coupling of the mid-infrared photon with the vibrons of phospholipid tails in the myelin. They proposed that cell vibron polariton in myelin sheaths may provide a promising way for super-efficient consumption of extra-weak bioenergy and even directly serve for quantum information18.

However, the question of the source of the radiation arose. Recently our group described a model in which electromagnetic waves—in the infrared and optical wavelength range—would be generated at the node of Ranvier, where the sodium currents would behave as an array of emitting nanoantennas19. Although the presence of photons has been experimentally proven in active nerve tissues, their occurrence in particular cell compartments, such as the nodes of Ranvier, has not yet been studied.

Aim of this study is to investigate the possibility that light-induced reduction of silver occurs in the node of Ranvier, during electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

Results

Silver deposits in the nodes of Ranvier

In order to investigate bio-photonic activity in nervous tissue, Sun et al. developed a new method called in situ biophoton autography (IBA), which is described in detail in the methods section12. This method relies on Ag+ to Ag reduction by means of exposure to light as in photography; Ag deposition in the tissue, after stimulation in a dark environment, can be identified under a light microscope, thus tracing the occurrence of photons. In their study, nervous tissue stimulation was obtained by light. By modifying IBA, we have developed a method to detect photons in the node of Ranvier associated to electrical stimulation of nerves. Likewise, the experimental set up was designed to include the sample in a sealed dark container, in order to ensure total insulation from external light during stimulation. This is explained in detail in the methods section. However, we used electrical stimulation instead of light to elicit action potentials, so as to avoid the presence of any photons coming from external light sources and thus obtaining evidence that photons emerge from cellular processes and are not introduced as such. Silver deposits in the nodes of Ranvier are visible as black or dark gray granules in a blue background, obtained using a standard blue toluidine staining technique, which makes nodes and other axonal structures clearly recognizable. Examples of nodes where Ag deposited after electrical stimulation of rat sciatic nerves are shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Examples of nodes where Ag deposited after electrical stimulation of rat sciatic nerves. In (ad) a zoom of some annular Ag depositions in the nodes are displayed. Circles in (e) put in evidence Ag deposition in the nodes and along paranodal segments.

Six sciatic nerves were harvested from Wistar rats. Stimulation was applied to 6 nerves, whereas 8 nerve segments were used as controls. Sections for histology where obtained from the specimens: 10 from the stimulated segments and 9 from the controls (Fig. 2a, b). Small sample areas, corresponding to nerve fascicles, were identified and marked in all sections, for a total number of 50 in stimulated group and 43 in controls (Fig. 2c, d).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Examples of rat sciatic nerve sections (a,b). Node count, by small circle markings, in delimited fascicular areas in sections from non-stimulated nerve (c) and stimulated nerve (d).

The density—number of nodes per surface unit—was calculated for each sample area. The mean value of density calculated from the stimulated sample areas turned out to be significantly higher than the mean value of the controls (Fig. 3; Table 1). The mean values are 5.5 (SD 4.8) for controls and 37.0 (SD 24.9) for stimulated nerves. To compare the two means, we performed a simple two-tailed Student’s t-test and a Welch one way ANOVA, resulting in a difference statistically significant at a level p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Up: Nodes’ density in sample areas in control nerves and nodes’ density in sample areas in stimulated nerves. NS non-stimulated (control nerve), S stimulated nerve, s section, a sample area (n integer, number of nerve, section and sample respectively); Down: Node density of “non stimulated” and “stimulated” sample groups represented as a boxplot including average values and standard deviation.

Table 1.

Nodes’ density in sample areas in control nerves and nodes’ density in sample areas in stimulated nerves.

Sample Nodes density values in sample areas of CONTROL NERVES—Nodes/mm2 Sample Nodes density values in sample areas of STIMULATED NERVES—Nodes/mm2
NS1 a1 3.6 S1 a1 15.6
NS1 a2 3.5 S1 a2 55.5
NS1 a3 9.3 S2 s1 a1 67.1
NS1 a4 1.9 S2 s1 a2 124.6
NS1 a5 2.4 S2 s1 a3 32.5
NS2 s1 a1 4.1 S2 s1 a4 28.7
NS2 s1 a2 7.0 S2 s1 a5 54.3
NS2 s1 a3 10.8 S2 s1 a6 50.8
NS2 s1 a4 6.8 S2 s1 a7 41.0
NS2 s1 a5 8.8 S2 s1 a8 33.9
NS2 s1 a6 9.5 S2 s1 a9 37.7
NS3 s1 a1 26.3 S2 s1 a10 55.9
NS3 s1 a2 4.7 S2 s1 a11 19.2
NS3 s1 a3 9.5 S2 s1 a12 20.2
NS3 s1 a4 11.9 S2 s1 a13 29.4
NS3 s1 a5 5.0 S2 s1 a14 0.0
NS3 s1 a6 3.9 S2 s1 a15 21.4
NS4 a1 9.8 S2 s1 a16 42.2
NS4 a2 3.8 S2 s2 a17 33.9
NS4 a3 5.0 S2 s2 a1 38.2
NS4 a4 3.6 S2 s2 a2 72.5
NS4 a5 2.9 S2 s2 a3 37.9
NS5 a1 1.1 S2 s2 a4 29.3
NS5 a2 0.0 S2 s2 a5 67.0
NS5 a3 0.0 S2 s2 a6 75.0
NS5 a4 0.0 S2 s2 a7 82.2
NS5 a5 0.0 S2 s2 a8 27.5
NS5 a6 0.0 S2 s2 a9 22.4
NS5 a7 0.0 S2 s2 a10 52.2
NS6 a1 6.1 S2 s2 a11 11.6
NS6 a2 0.3 S2 s2 a12 13.8
NS6 a3 0.0 S2 s2 a13 13.5
NS6 a4 9.8 S2 s2 a14 20.6
NS7 s1 a1 5.3 S2 s2 a15 0.0
NS7 s1 a2 5.3 S2 s2 a16 40.2
NS7 s1 a3 9.7 S3 s1 a1 29.3
NS7 s1 a4 9.7 S3 s1 a2 61.7
NS7 s2 a1 6.7 S3 s1 a3 30.9
NS7 s2 a2 8.7 S3 s2 a1 38.9
NS7 s2 a3 8.8 S3 s2 a2 92.5
NS7 s2 a4 4.8 S3 s2 a3 48.9
NS8 a1 4.0 S4 s1 a1 9.5
NS8 a2 1.9 S4 s1 a2 11.4
S4 s2 a1 8.9
S5 s1 a1 34.0
S5 s1 a2 22.2
S5 s2 a1 23.4
S5 s2 a2 12.6
S6 a1 48.6
S6 a2 8.6

The values reported below correspond in detail to the Fig. 3 data.

NS control nerve, S stimulated nerve, s section, a sample area.

A significant difference between cases and controls is shown, demonstrating the occurrence of the phenomenon in association with nerve activity. Some findings, though limited in number, are worth to be mentioned, for their possible significance, which will be considered in the discussion section. In some specimens a spiral arrangement of Ag impregnation, as shown in Fig. 4, was observed in the paranodal region, resembling typical canalicular structures of noncompacted myelin, as described in histologic studies20.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Two different examples (left and right) of Ag deposition (black) in the paranode after electrical stimulation of the rat sciatic nerves.

Discussion

Photographic effect in the node of Ranvier after electric stimulation

Our study demonstrated experimentally the occurrence of a significant photographic effect in the node of Ranvier after electric nerve stimulation, in total absence of external or artificial light sources.

Our findings have come in a field of research that is attracting growing interest, namely the electromagnetic aspects of action potential and neural communication2,21. The topic of light transfer through nervous tissues has been addressed by previous studies, either experimentally or by modeling12,13. Beyond the evidence of the role of photons in different forms of cellular communication22, the hypothesis that light may play some role in neurotransmission has been corroborated by the possibility that the myelin sheath behaves like a waveguide, whereas the origin of photons is controversial8,13.

However, if myelin works as a waveguide, it remains to be explained what happens in the nodal gaps, where the myelin sheath is interrupted. Our group proposed the hypothesis that photons originate in the node of Ranvier and described a model of electromagnetic radiation emitted from nodal ionic currents19. By introducing in the simulation known dimensional parameters and physical properties of the involved biological structures (i.e. node, paranode, myelin, sodium channels), the patterns of the electromagnetic fields and wave propagation in the node-myelin complex resulted to lie in the visible and infrared bandwidth. Since this interval includes wavelengths suitable for Ag+ photoreduction, the present findings are consistent with the proposed model of photonic radiation in the node of Ranvier. An interesting issue concerns whether wavelengths not able to reduce Ag+ participate in the overall process. In a recent study, the possibility of THz wave propagation in the myelin was investigated by simulation15. We cannot exclude other phenomena and electromagnetic radiation at different wavelengths. Indeed, the method of Ag+ photo-reduction is most effectively able to detect photons in the visible range which is a portion of wavelengths provided by our theoretical model.

Even though the aim of the study is to investigate the photographic effect in the node, the incidental finding of silver granules in the paranodal domain is worth to be discussed.

Kumar et al. argued that a possible issue of future research would be to demonstrate experimentally the presence of photons in axonal structures, suggesting that Ag+ in solution injected in the cytoplasmic loops could precipitate in Ag granules when exposed to photons13. Interestingly, our findings showed some Ag depositions visible in the paranode, in correspondence of the typical spiral shaped structures of non-compacted myelin described in anatomical studies20. These structures communicate with the extracellular medium and can be perfused by Ag+ in solution, which precipitates as Ag when exposed to radiation.

In fact, this site is located right in the trajectory of photons, as predicted by the described model19. Nevertheless, Ag granules were sparse and, similarly, no significantly representative Ag deposition was visible in the axon lumen, as was the case in Sun’s study12. This could be explained by the fact that nodes are more exposed to solutes, while a longer bathing time would be needed to obtain an efficient perfusion of the paranodal structures.

Photonic radiation detected

In this study, we have demonstrated the presence of photonic radiation in the node of Ranvier by means of a photographic technique. These results open new perspectives towards the hypothesis that photons may play a role in the transfer of information from one node to another or even contribute to the action potential. In relation to this, further considerations can be made. The model of electromagnetic radiation coming from the node we recently proposed19 and that one concerning the optical transmission through a myelin waveguide, previously described by Kumar and other authors1316,19, are consistent with each other and with our experimental results and can be considered as a more comprehensive model, describing the whole sequence of generation and transmission of photons, in the node and through the myelin respectively. However, hypotheses describing how photons act when they reach the next node are still missing and deserve further research13,19.

Possible explanations for the photonic activity: what is the effect of photons in the next node?

A possible effect to investigate is the influence on channel gating. Ion channel stimulation by light has been subject of many studies. For example, with the purpose of functional analyses of neural circuits, a method for optical stimulation of genetically designated neurons was developed23. Although this method and the following widespread use of similar techniques allowed a variety of studies on the physiology of neural circuits by optical stimulation, photosensitivity was genetically induced and a possible physiological role of photons in neural function remained unclear. The main issue of our study and previous works on the same topic is to investigate whether light sensitivity is an intrinsic property of the neural system and play a more extensive role in neurotransmission, other than retinal photoreception. Light responsive ion channels are widely represented in nature, throughout the history of cellular evolution, from prokaryotes to retinal cells24. Although light sensitivity has become predominant during evolution in some channels due to their special function, many other channels, beside voltage sensitivity as the main mechanism of operation, show some response to light25,26. Furthermore, the reactivity of non-photosensitive neurons to infrared laser radiation has been attributed to TRPV4 ion channels due to thermal activation, although the exact mechanism is unclear2729.

Another possible role of photons in node to node signaling may involve ion permeation. For example, they could influence the energetic state of ions in the channel or at molecular binding sites30. Further studies are needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying the sensitivity to light of the molecular systems involved in neurotransmission, including channel proteins. In particular, we believe that it is worth to further explore the possible role of photons in ion channel operation.

Another interesting issue that arises is the possible relevance of some quantum effects in neural communication, which has been the subject of numerous studies in recent decades, providing an alternative to the purely classical approach to some phenomena that are still unexplained.

In fact, the so-called quantum biology has been the subject of much literature and experimental studies, from the cellular level to the highest brain functions, including an intriguing, though controversial, interpretation of consciousness3135.

The proof that photons occur in the node of Ranvier and in other structures of myelinic axon, suggests that they may actively participate in the processes of neurotransmission. Nonetheless, it offers novel arguments of investigation by a quantum mechanical approach, beside classical electromagnetism, in neuroscience. In fact, Ag+-photoreduction method is most effectively able to detect exposure to photons, but it does not allow an evaluation of their statistical properties. Thus, the results of the present study can be considered as the starting point for further investigation, exploring the phenomenon from a quantum mechanical point of view. To achieve the goal of studying the statistical properties of the field, we think that a measuring device, capable of detecting very weak sources, is needed. In literature, an interesting method for photon emission detection which makes use of superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) is described. In particular, this can be found in a recently published work36 from Chenglong You et al., which seems a very interesting approach, exploiting the advantages of self-learning features of artificial neural networks and the naive Bayes classifier in the photon emission detection and offering new possibilities in terms of studying extremely weak light sources.

Some considerations, pertaining to Health topics, deserve further discussion.

In the last decade, laser stimulation techniques have reached a significant development, both in research and in clinical application, showing beneficial effects in many medical conditions such as chronic pain, chronic inflammation and even in nerve repair26,37.

A very interesting research topic is the influence of laser light in the visible wavelength range on nervous tissue regeneration. In particular, neurite growth has been observed in rat primary cortical neurons after 710 nm light irradiation38 and numerous studies have assessed sciatic nerve regeneration after injury, following treatment with visible radiation of different wavelengths39,40.

Concerning medical applications, laser therapy, especially in the form of low-level-laser therapy, a form of light therapy using wavelengths of 600–1000 nm, showed to be effective in different medical conditions, many of which pertaining to the nervous system41,42.

This has stimulated a growing interest in the mechanisms underlying nervous response to light. For example, Liebert et al. have hypothesized the existence of a mechanism of integrated and rapid modulation of ion channels, facilitated by photons, which would influence the transmission of neural information both in the peripheral and in the central nervous system43,44.

In relation to all the previous discussion points, the presence of photons in the activated axon suggests the possibility that the light-sensitive properties of neurons are intrinsic rather than an aspecific responsiveness to the electromagnetic stimulus. A deeper knowledge of the role of photons in neurotransmission and neuromodulation would contribute enormously to further development of the already promising therapeutic potential of laser light in neurology.

For the same reasons illustrated above, it cannot be excluded that photons play a role in regulatory networks of proteins involved in the homeostasis of the node-myelin complex. This may be considered as a functional unit, whose anatomical and ultrastructural characteristics are subject to fine tuning to regulate the conduction features45. Such a dynamic balance is maintained by the interaction of glial cells with ion channels, other membrane proteins and the cytoskeleton46. Impairment of this complex is often associated to the development of neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis47. Therefore, further studies on the possible role of photons in the regulatory mechanisms of node-myelin functional unit may provide a better knowledge and new therapeutic options for neurodegenerative diseases.

Methods

General procedure

The experiments were carried out on sciatic nerve segments from previously euthanized adult Wistar rats (400–500 g) at the Centre for Experimental Research, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy. Euthanasia was carried out according to the National Health Service Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and it has been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore and Italian Ministry of Health (Project No. 1F295.N.WD5).

Aim of the procedure was to expose the nerve segment to Ag+ in solution, during electrical stimulation, in order to ascertain if Ag granules, as a result of photo-activated Ag reduction, could be detected specifically in the nodes by microscopy.

The principle by which photons should be detected is photoreduction of ionic Ag+ (colorless) to Ag, which precipitates as insoluble black granules48. Based on this principle, a method of “in situ biophoton autography” (IBA) has been described by Sun et al. This method is a staining technique with a silver ionic compound, AgNO3. The Ag precipitation mechanism here exploited, is the same as in photography, i.e. reduction of Ag+ to Ag by light exposure and subsequently Ag deposition in situ. Deposited dark Ag granules are insoluble in water and organic solvents such as alcohol and xylene, and they can be identified morphologically under common light microscopes. Ag+ was introduced in the form of an aqueous 10% solution of AgNO3 during nerve stimulation and subsequently removed by means of sodium thiosulphate (Na2S2O3) to remove all the residual not reduced silver cations, thus avoiding further subsequent precipitation due to environmental light exposure after withdrawal of the specimen. In addition, the thiosulphate treatment allows to complex silver cations that could be precipitated eventually as silver oxide (dark brown in color), that can be misinterpreted as solid Ag. The stoichiometry of the reaction is 1:2 in thiosulphate, to avoid the known formation of Ag2S and promoting the known complexation reaction described above:

Ag++2 S2O32-AgS2O323- 1

Stimulation of neural tissues was obtained by light emitting diodes, in a completely darkened container designed to avoid light exposure of the immersed tissues. In these conditions, the silver cations reduction could only be ascribed to the light transmission through the tissue12.

Similarly, our experimental procedure was designed to avoid exposure to environmental light during nerve stimulation. To this purpose all the nerve treatment steps, reported in the following description, were carried out in a dark polystyrene isothermal box, to obtain total insulation from external light.

The steps for chemical treatment of the nerve were as follows: (1) tissues immersed in a 10% AgNO3 solution in a container for 30 min in a dark box in a dark room; (2) rinse in 252 mM sucrose for 15 min; (3) fixation by 10% formaldehyde for 5 min; (4) rinse in de-ionized water for 5 min; (5) rinse in 10% sodium thiosulfate for 15 min; (6) fixation by 10% polyformaldehyde. Steps 1–5 followed the technique described by Sun et al12.

As in IBA, stimulation was applied during step 1. However, in order to avoid the use of any artificial light source, in our study compound action potentials were elicited electrically, by means of a square wave electric stimulus having the following characteristics: voltage magnitude = 3Vpp, frequency = 20 Hz (i.e., 50 ms of time period), duty cycle = 5% i.e. on duration about 2.5 ms, off time 47.5 ms.

The experimental setting was prepared as follows: a nerve stimulation chamber (Nerve chamber, BIOPAC Systems, Inc.) was placed in the dark box. The tube for infusion of bathing solutions and electric wires were inserted through holes into the box and protected from external light by drapes and envelopes. After positioning the electrodes and connecting the infusion tube to the chamber, the volume to be injected was previously calibrated at the adequate level to avoid contact with the stimulation grid during the procedure.

After euthanasia, sciatic nerves were harvested by delicate dissection from crural to tibial region. Short segments were cut apart from each nerve to serve as controls.

The prepared nerve was immediately placed on the stimulation grid of the nerve bathing chamber (Nerve chamber, BIOPAC Systems, Inc.) at room temperature. The distal end of the nerve was left hanging down for 1 cm in the reservoir of the chamber, to allow immersion in bathing solutions during stimulation. The box was closed and the procedure performed from step 1 to 6 (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Experimental setup for nerve stimulation and chemical processing. (a) The Biopac nerve chamber in acrylic (Biopac ®); it features 15 stainless steel pins; each pin is spaced 5 mm apart to provide a variety of recording and stimulation configurations; the sockets accept 2 mm plugs and interface with stimulation and recording cables; the nerve chamber is secured within the polystyrene dark box to prevent environmental light from hitting the nerve. (b) Stimulation and measurement electrodes connected to the steel pins and a rat nerve placed on the pins. (c) The final lab setup: by means of a tube the different solutions for the chemical treatment of nerves can be introduced or extracted without opening the box; wires from the electrodes and the tube are passed through holes in the box wall and isolated by envelopes; the dark box is closed and ready for the experiment.

Control segments underwent the same procedure, except stimulation.

After completion of the procedure the box was opened and the specimen (the nerve distal segment previously immersed in solutions) was cut and placed in formaldehyde 10% for histology. At this step all the silver from the solution should have been either precipitated or removed by the treatment. However, in order to prevent precipitation of unexpected residual silver after exposure to environmental light, harvesting was performed in a dark environment.

After 48 h fixation in formaldehyde, the specimen was processed for embedding in paraffin. 5 µm thick slices were obtained, stained by toluidine blue standard technique and cover slipped.

Digital images acquisition and statistical analysis

Digital images were acquired from the slides by NanoZoomer Digital Pathology System C9600 series, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., for histologic study. Each digitized image of nerve sections was examined by an image viewing software, NDP.view2, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.. Image areas containing tissues other than nerve fibers, artifacts and regions of poor optical quality where discarded. Sample areas of tissue, corresponding to fascicular groups of fibers, were identified and measured by means of the viewing software tools (NDP.view2, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.).

Within each area, the nodes of Ranvier containing silver precipitates were identified, marked and counted. The density of marked nodes (nodes/mm2) was calculated for each sample area as shown in Fig. 3. To compare the means of densities coming from non-stimulated and stimulated nerves, we performed several statistical tests with the help of the R platform49. Strictly speaking, our data do not fulfill the assumptions of classical parametric tests, such as two-tailed Student’s t-test and one way ANOVA. The two groups have remarkably different standard deviations and the data appear to be drawn from somewhat long-tailed distributions. Here we summarize the results of some tests (assuming that they are sufficiently robust to non-normality): pairwise t-test adjusted for different sd (p = 1.7e−8), Welch corrected one-way ANOVA (p = 1.7e−8), Kruskal–Wallis (p = 3.1e−9), Wilcoxon with continuity correction (p = 3.2e−9).

Preparation of the solutions

Silver nitrate solution was prepared dissolving 10 g of AgNO3 (Sigma Aldrich, ≥ 99.0%.) in 100 ml of pure water (corresponding to a concentration 0.6 M). The sodium thiosulphate solution was prepared dissolving 20 g of Na2S2O3 (Sigma Aldrich, > 99%) in 100 mL of pure water (corresponding to a concentration of 1.3 M); the molarity of the second solution was about double the first one, in order to be sure to have the silver cation: thiosulphate anion in the 1:2 ratio according to the requested stoichiometric coefficient ratio (see Eq. 1).

Sucrose (C12H22O11) (Sigma Aldrich, BioXtra, ≥ 99.5% (GC)) solution 0.252 mM was prepared dissolving 43,13 g in 500 mL of pure water.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Daniela Sacripanti (Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, UOC Anatomy and Pathological Istology, Roma, Italy) for providing support to carry out the ex vivo experiments.

Author contributions

A.Z. and D.M. conceived the study, designed and performed all ex vivo experiments and data analysis reported in the manuscript; A.Z. and D.M. prepared all figures. R.G. provided chemical technical support for the conceiving of the experiments, contributed to the results discussion and analysis. A.T. made the statistical analysis of the collected data and contributed to the results discussion and analysis. V.B. made the histological analysis and contributed to the elucidation of the results; G.B. performed ex vivo harvesting procedures of the biological samples and contributed to the experiments; M.E.C. supervised adequate application of the experimental procedures and animal care standards. All the authors provided critical recommendation on data results’ significance in relation to current available literature. All the authors supported to write the manuscript and actively contributed to the results’ discussion.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 1952;117:500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anastassiou C, Perin R, Markram H, et al. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2011;14:217–223. doi: 10.1038/nn.2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wu F, Ma J, Zhang G. A new neuron model under electromagnetic field. Appl. Math. Comput. 2019;347:590–599. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cifra M, Fields JZ, Farhadi A. Electromagnetic cellular interactions. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2011;105:223–246. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buzsáki G, Anastassiou CA, Koch C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012;13:407–420. doi: 10.1038/nrn3241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liboff AR. A human source for ELF magnetic perturbations. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2016;35:337–342. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1107841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Isakovic J, Dobbs-Dixon I, Chaudhury D, Mitrecic D. Modeling of inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields in the nervous system: a novel paradigm in understanding cell interactions, disease etiology and therapy. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:12909. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31054-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang R, Dai J. Biophoton signal transmission and processing in the brain. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014;139:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Traill RR. The case that mammalian intelligence is based on sub-molecular memory coding and fibre-optic capabilities of myelinated nerve axons. Specul. Sci Technol. 1988;11:173–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Persinger MA, Dotta BT, Saroka KS. Bright light transmits through the brain: measurement of photon emissions and frequency-dependent modulation of spectral electroencephalographic power. World J. Neuro. 2013;3:10–16. doi: 10.4236/wjns.2013.31002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fraser A, Frey AH. Electromagnetic emission at micron wavelengths from active nerves. Biophys J. 1968;8:731–734. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86517-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun Y, Wang C, Dai J. Biophotons as neural communication signals demonstrated by in situ biophoton autography. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2010;9:315–322. doi: 10.1039/b9pp00125e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kumar S, et al. Possible existence of optical communication channels in the brain. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36508 (1–13). doi: 10.1038/srep36508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ostafiychuk, O. M., Es'kin, V. A., Kudrin, A. V. & Popova, A. A. Electromagnetic waves guided by a myelinated axon in the optical and infrared ranges, in PhotonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium—Spring (PIERS-Spring), Rome, Italy, 1180–1184 (2019).
  • 15.Liu G, Chang C, Qiao Z, Wu K, Zhu Z, Cui G, Peng W, Tang Y, Li J, Fan C. Myelin sheath as a dielectric waveguide for signal propagation in the mid-infrared to terahertz spectral range. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29(7):1807862(1–6). doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu J, Xu Y, Sun W, et al. Experimental and computational studies on the basic transmission properties of electromagnetic waves in softmaterial waveguides. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:13824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32345-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiang Z, Tang C, Chang C, Liu G. A primary model of THz and far-infrared signal generation and conduction in neuron systems based on the hypothesis of the ordered phase of water molecules on the neuron surface I: signal characteristics. Sci. Bull. 2020;65(4):308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Song B, Shu Y. Cell vibron polariton resonantly self-confined in the myelin sheath of nerve. Nano Res. 2020;13:38–44. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2568-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zangari A, Micheli D, Galeazzi R, Tozzi A. Node of Ranvier as an array of bio-nanoantennas for infrared communication in nerve tissue. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:539. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18866-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Arroyo E, Scherer S. On the molecular architecture of myelinated fibers. Histochemistry. 2000;113:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s004180050001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xu J, Xu S. A field-view on the generation of a single neural pulse and delay in neighboring pulses. Arch. Neurol. Neurosci. 2020;6:2. doi: 10.33552/ANN.2020.06.000631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cifra M, Pospišil P. Ultra-weak photon emission from biological samples: definition, mechanisms, properties, detection and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014;139:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zemelman BV, Lee GA, Ng M, Miesenböck G. Selective photostimulation of genetically chARGed neurons. Neuron. 2002;33:15–22. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00574-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oda K, Vierock J, Oishi S, et al. Crystal structure of the red light-activated channel rhodopsin Chrimson. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06421-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Möglich A, Ayers RA, Moffat K. Structure and signaling mechanism of per-ARNT-Sim domains. Structure. 2009;17:1282–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shapiro MG, Homma K, Villarreal S, Richter CP, Bezanilla F. Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:736. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Albert ES, Bec JM, Desmadryl G, Chekroud K, Travo C, Gaboyard S, et al. TRPV4 channels mediate the infrared laser evoked response in sensory neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2012;107:3227–3234. doi: 10.1152/jn.00424.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arrigoni C, et al. Unfolding of a temperature-sensitive domain controls voltage-gated channel activation. Cell. 2016;164:922–936. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chowdhury S, Jarecki BW, Chanda B. A molecular framework for temperature-dependent gating of ion channels. Cell. 2014;158:1148–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chowdhury S, Chanda B. Free-energy relationships in ion channels activated by voltage and ligand. J. Gen. Physiol. 2013;141:11–28. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201210860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jedlicka P. Revisiting the quantum brain hypothesis: toward quantum (neuro)biology? Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017;10:366. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vaziri A, Plenio M. Quantum coherence in ion channels: resonances, transport and verification. New J. Phys. 2010;12:85001. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/085001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qaswal AB. Quantum tunneling of ions through the closed voltage-gated channels of the biological membrane: a mathematical model and implications. Quantum Rep. 2019;1:219–225. doi: 10.3390/quantum1020019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hameroff SR, Penrose R. Conscious events as orchestrated space–time selections. J. Conscious Stud. 1996;3:36–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koch C, Hepp K. Quantum mechanics in the brain. Nature. 2006;440:611. doi: 10.1038/440611a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.You C, Quiroz-Juárez MA, Lambert A, Bhusal N, Dong C, Perez-Leija A, Javaid A, Le'on-Montiel RD, Magaña-Loaiza O. Identification of light sources using machine learning. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2020;7:021404. doi: 10.1063/1.5133846. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mou Z, You M, Xue W. Gold nanorod-assisted near-infrared stimulation of bullfrog sciatic nerve. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33:1907–1912. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2554-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Choi DH, Lee KH, Kim JH, Kim MY, Lim JH, Lee J. Effect of 710 nm visible light irradiation on neurite outgrowth in primary rat cortical neurons following ischemic insult. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;422:274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.04.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang CZ, Chen YJ, Wang YH, Yeh ML, Huang MH, et al. Low-level laser irradiation improves functional recovery and nerve regeneration in sciatic nerve crush rat injury model. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barbosa RI, Marcolino AM, de Jesus-Guirro RR, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, de Cássia-Registro-Fonseca M. Comparative effects of wavelengths of low-power laser in regeneration of sciatic nerve in rats following crushing lesion. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25:423–430. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0750-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dima R, Tieppo Francio V, Towery C, Davani S. Review of literature on low-level laser therapy benefits for nonpharmacological pain control in chronic pain and osteoarthritis. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2018;24:8–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Littlefield PD, Vujanovic I, Mundi J, Matic AI, Richter CP. Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:2071–2082. doi: 10.1002/lary.21102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liebert AD, Bicknell BT, Adams RD. Protein conformational modulation by photons: a mechanism for laser treatment effects. Med. Hypotheses. 2014;82:275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Andreo L, Soldera CB, Ribeiro BG, de Matos PRV, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KPS, Mesquita-Ferrari RA. Effects of photobiomodulation on experimental models of peripheral nerve injury. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32:2155–2165. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2359-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arancibia-Cárcamo IL, Ford MC, Cossell L, Ishida K, Tohyama K, Attwell D. Node of Ranvier length as a potential regulator of myelinated axon conduction speed. Elife. 2017;6:e23329. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Buttermore ED, Thaxton CL, Bhat MA. Organization and maintenance of molecular domains in myelinated axons. J. Neurosci. Res. 2013;91:603–622. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Susuki K. Node of Ranvier disruption as a cause of neurological diseases. ASN Neuro. 2013;5:209–219. doi: 10.1042/AN20130025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hou WC, Stuart B, Howes R, Zepp RG. Sunlight-driven reduction of silver ions by natural organic matter: formation and transformation of silver nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47:7713–7721. doi: 10.1021/es400802w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2020). https://www.R-project.org/.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES