Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;11:3106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82665-8

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Case demonstration: (A) 46 y/o female VS patient who underwent GKRS and sequential MRI follow-up (follow-up MR images revealed positive response to radiation and ongoing tumor regression); (B) 53 y/o male VS patient who underwent GKRS and sequential MRI follow-up (follow-up MR images also showed positive response to radiation treatment with loss of MR imaging signal in center of tumor but transient enlargement of tumor); (C) 43-year-old female VS patient who underwent GKRS and sequential MRI follow-up (follow-up MR images obtained at 6 months after GKRS showed poor response to radiation treatment). A loss of central enhancement was observed in the early stage after GKRS; however, the tumor continued growing. At most follow-up time points, the differences between the predictions of AI models and clinical measurements were less than 10%. The trends of the tumor progression or regression predicted by the proposed AI model were remarkably accurate.