Table 2.
The group mean ACC, RTs and IESs values that entered the analysis to explore the possible presence of an interaction effect between Matching-with-correction and Error-type (last step of Analysis 2).
| Action-Error, Match | Action-Error, Mismatch | Goal-Error, Match | Goal-Error, Mismatch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normalized (error/correct) accuracy | ||||
| Mean | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.95 |
| SD | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Normalized (error/correct) reaction times | ||||
| Mean | 1.10 | 1.24 | 1.06 | 1.24 |
| SD | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| Normalized (error/correct) inverse efficiency scores | ||||
| Mean | 1.12 | 1.31 | 1.06 | 1.41 |
| SD | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.16 |
Match = Matching-with-correction condition; Mismatch = Not-Matching-with-correction condition. Here, the participant’s performance in each condition following a partner’s error (i.e., Matching-with-correction in Action-Error, Matching-with-correction in Goal-Error, Not-Matching-with-correction in Action-Error, Not-Matching-with-correction in Goal-Error) was normalized by dividing it by the participant’s performance in trials following a partner’s correct action.