Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;21:51. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01418-5

Table 1.

Basic demographics and medical information

Total IPF CTD-ILD Non-IPF/non-CTD
n = 90 n = 27 (30%) n = 34 (37.8%) n = 29 (32.2%)
Femalea,b 53 (58.9%) 8 (29.6%) 24 (70.6%) 21 (72.4%)
Agea,c (years) 66.5 (18) 71.0 (12) 56.0 (16) 68.0 (15)
Ethnicity
 Caucasian 76 (84.4%) 25 (92.6%) 25 (73.5%) 26 (89.7%)
 Other 14 (15.6%) 2 (7.4%) 9 (26.5%) 3 (10.3%)
Smoking Statusa,b
 Never smoked 44 (48.9%) 5 (18.5%) 19 (55.9%) 20 (69.0%)
 Ever smoked 46 (51.1%) 22 (81.4%) 15 (454.1%) 9 (31.0%)
Treatments
 Cortico-steroidsa,b 43 (47.8%) 2 (7.4%) 22 (64.7%) 19 (65.5%)
 Anti-fibrotic agentsa,b 26 (28.9%) 24 (88.9%) 1 (2.9%) 1 (3.4%)
 Immunosuppressiona,b,c 35 (38.9%) 0 25 (73.5%) 10 (34.5%)
 Anti-reflux therapy 30 (33.3%) 9 (33.3%) 12 (35.3%) 9 (31.0%)
Supplemental oxygen
 Continuous 11 (12.2%) 5 (18.5%) 3 (8.8%) 3 (10.3%)
Pulmonary hypertension
 Present 12 (13.3%) 2 (7.4%) 5 (14.7%) 5 (17.2%)
Lung function
 FVC %Predicted n = 90 74 (31) 77 (45) 74 (32) 56 (47)
 DLCO %Predicted n = 88 51 (26) 47.5 (23) 49 (46) 51 (33)
 TLC %Predicted n = 40 66 (27) 63 (39) 67 (27) 66 (29)

All data shown as number (percent) or median (interquartile range)

IPF idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, CTD-ILD connective-tissue disease associated interstitial lung disease, FVC forced vital capacity, DLCO diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, TLC total lung capacity

aSignificant difference between IPF and CTD-ILD

bSignificant difference between IPF and other

cSignificant difference between CTD-ILD and non-IPF/non-CTD