Table 1.
Participant characteristics | Male (n=11) | Female (n=10) |
---|---|---|
Education, n (%) | ||
Secondary school or equivalent (low education) | 1 (9) | 0 (0) |
Intermediate between secondary level and university (eg, NVQ3–5a, diploma, and apprenticeship (low education) | 5 (46) | 2 (20) |
University degree or equivalent (High education) | 5 (46) | 8 (80) |
Estimated household income in the last year (before tax and not including benefits), £, n (%) | ||
Lowest income < 16,000 and/or eligible for means tested benefits | 3 (27) | 0 (0) |
Low income 16,000–24,999 | 1 (9) | 4 (40) |
Mid income 25,000–34,999 (33,331-46,662) | 3 (27) | 0 (0) |
High income 35,000–44,999 | 0 (0) | 2 (20) |
Highest income > 45,000 | 2 (18) | 2 (20) |
Prefer not to say | 2 (18) | 2 (20) |
Use of digital interventions, n (%) | ||
Lighter (≤2 interventions) | 7 (64) | 5 (50) |
Heavier (> 2 interventions) | 4 (36) | 5 (50) |
Home neighborhood deprivationb, n (%) | ||
1 Most deprived | 1 (9) | 2 (20) |
2 Lower SESc | 2 (18) | 1 (10) |
3 Mid SES | 3 (27) | 1 (10) |
4 Higher SES | 1 (9) | 2 (20) |
5 Highest SES | 4 (36) | 3 (30) |
Not available | 0 (0) | 1 (10) |
Age, years, n (%) | ||
21–40 | 1 (9) | 1 (10) |
41–60 | 4 (36) | 5 (50) |
61–70 | 6 (55) | 4 (40) |
71–80 | 2 (18) | 1 (10) |
aNVQ3–5: National Vocational Qualification levels 3 to 5
bIndices of multiple deprivation score derived from the participant’s home post code were used to determine the participant’s neighbourhood deprivation within the United Kingdom, and the quintile is given
cSES: socioeconomic status