Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;21:286. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10293-y

Table 2.

Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models on individual and contextual factors associated with circumcision among women aged 15–49 in Chad

Variables Model 0 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
aOR [95% CI] aOR [95% CI] aOR [95% CI]
Individual level factors
Mother’s education
  No education Ref Ref
  Primary 0.79[0.60–1.04] 0.81[0.61–1.07]
  Secondary/Higher 0.44***[0.28–0.68] 0.45***[0.29–0.71]
Partner’s education
  No education Ref Ref
  Primary 0.95[0.71–1.29] 0.99[0.73–1.34]
  Secondary/Higher 0.82[0.60–1.13] 0.85[0.62–1.16]
Marital status
  Married Ref Ref
  Cohabiting 1.00[0.68–1.48] 1.00[0.68–1.48]
Employment status
 Not working 0.80*[0.64–0.99] 0.79*[0.64–0.99]
 Working Ref Ref
Ethnicity
  Sara Ref Ref
  Gorane 0.005***[0.002–0.011] 0.005***[0.002–0.010]
  Arab 1.13[0.60–2.12] 1.08[0.58–2.03]
  Ouaadai/maba/massalit/mimi 0.81[0.40–1.62] 0.74[0.37–1.49]
  Kenemu-Borno 0.012***[0.001–0.025] 0.011***[0.005–0.023]
  Boulala/medego/kouka 0.17***[0.08–0.36] 0.17***[0.08–0.36]
  Other 0.13***[0.06–0.17] 0.12***[0.07–0.20]
Religion
  Christianity 0.10***[0.06–0.17] 0.12***[0.07–0.19]
  Islam Ref Ref
  Other 0.09***[0.03–0.21] 0.10***[0.04–0.24]
Frequency of reading newspaper/magazine
  Not at all Ref Ref
  Less than once a week/at least once a week 0.98[0.61–1.58] 0.95[0.59–1.54]
Frequency of listening to radio
  Not at all Ref Ref
  Less than once a week/at least once a week 0.95[0.72–1.25] 0.98[0.74–1.29]
Frequency of watching television
  Not at all Ref Ref
  Less than once a week/at least once a week 1.28[0.88–1.84] 1.34[0.93–1.94]
Wealth quintile
  Poorest Ref Ref
  Poorer 0.75[0.56–1.02] 0.75[0.56–1.02]
  Middle 0.73[0.53–1.01] 0.73[0.53–1.01]
  Richer 0.67*[0.47–0.94] 0.68*[0.48–0.96]
  Richest 0.65[0.40–1.05] 0.88[0.51–1.52]
Contextual factors
Community literacy level
  Low Ref Ref
  Medium 0.25***[0.12–0.54] 0.42**[0.22–0.80]
  High 0.09***[0.04–0.19] 0.27**[0.13–0.54]
Community socio-economic status
  Low Ref Ref
  Medium 0.83[0.21–3.33] 0.86[0.55–1.34]
  High 1.26[0.60–2.65] 0.97[0.48–1.94]
Random effect result
  PSU variance (95% CI) 19.6 (15.0–25.5) 8.1 (6.5–10.1) 18.4 (14.2–23.7) 7.99 (6.41–9.95)
  ICC 85.6% 71.2% 84.8% 70.8%
  LR Test χ2 = 3915.41, p < 0.001 χ2 = 1815.97, p < 0.001 χ2 = 3742.84, p < 0.001 χ2 = 1801.56, p < 0.001
  Wald χ2 Reference 491.58*** 46.41** 509.50***
  Model fitness
   Log-likelihood − 2432.46 − 2149.31 − 2420.83 − 2141.16
   AIC 4868.93 4344.62 4853.66 4336.32
N 6334 6334 6334 6334

Source: 2014–2015 Chad Demographic and Health Survey

Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

N Sample size, Ref Reference category, PSU Primary Sampling Unit; ICC Intra-Class Correlation, LR Test Likelihood ratio Test, AIC Akaike’s Information Criterion