Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 29;13(2):e11902. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201911902

Figure EV4. Consequences of Fc silencing and chelation of CC‐1.

Figure EV4

  • A
    Binding of CC‐1 (FcKO) and a variant containing a wild type Fc part (FcWT) to the indicated his‐tagged FcR was determined by ELISA. All experiments were performed at a neutral pH except for FcRn, where binding was additionally evaluated at a pH of 6. Means of duplicate measurements are shown.
  • B, C
    BsAbs in the Fabsc and IgGsc format chelated or not to p‐NCS‐Bn‐NODAGA were incubated with (B) 22Rv1high (PSMA+) cells or (C) Jurkat (CD3+) cells followed by binding analysis by flow cytometry.
  • D
    LNCaP cells were incubated with PBMC and the indicated concentrations of chelated or native bsAbs, and T‐cell activation was assessed using a 3H thymidine uptake assay.