Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;11(3):1413–1431. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7153

TABLE B1.

Number of individuals that had significant (α < 0.05, confidence intervals do not include 0) positive (+) or negative (−) modeled relationship with each resource attribute from population‐level resource utilization functions for wolves and coyotes (excluding land cover covariates). Resource utilization functions were estimated for active and inactive GPS locations during three time periods related to white‐tailed deer: preparturition (PPP, 1–26 May), fawn limited mobility period (LMP, 27 May–30 June), and fawn social mobility period (SMP, 1 July–31 August), Michigan's Upper Peninsula, USA, 2013–2015

Resource attribute Coyote Wolf
Active Inactive Active Inactive
PPP LMP SMP PPP LMP SMP PPP LMP SMP PPP LMP SMP
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
Intercept 1 4 4 6 3 8 0 3 1 4 0 6 1 3 3 4 7 4 0 0 2 2 2 3
Distance to edge 0 5 2 8 4 7 1 2 2 3 1 5 2 2 0 7 3 8 0 0 0 4 0 5
Distance to road NA NA NA NA 6 5 1 2 1 4 3 3 1 3 3 4 3 8 0 0 1 3 0 5
Distance to water 3 2 4 6 2 3 NA NA 2 1 NA NA 1 3 1 6 2 9 0 0 0 4 0 5
Doe occurrence 2 3 5 5 6 5 NA NA NA NA 2 4 1 3 3 4 3 8 0 0 2 2 2 3
Grouse density 2 3 6 4 4 7 2 1 2 3 4 2 0 4 5 2 6 5 0 0 2 2 2 3
Hare density 2 3 5 5 6 5 0 3 2 3 4 2 4 0 5 2 6 5 0 0 4 0 2 3
Patch size NA NA NA NA 5 6 NA NA 2 3 1 5 NA NA 1 6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Wolf occurrence 3 2 6 4 6 5 1 2 2 3 2 4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA