TABLE 1.
Percent similarity to the respective Sanger sequence for the datasets 17075, 17078, 16416, 16427, and 16483 from Wurzbacher et al. (2019)
| SampleID | 17075 | 17078 | 16416 | 16427 | 16483 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGSpeciesID | |||||
| ONT Medaka | 98.6% (10/726) | 99.2% (6/741) | 99.5% (4/731) | 99.6% (3/790) | 100% (0/709) |
| ONT Racon | 98.5% (11/726) | 99.1% (7/741) | 99.7% (2/731) | 99.1% (7/790) | 99.9% (1/709) |
| PB Racon | 98.6% (10/726) | 99.1% (7/741) | 99.9% (1/731) | 99.6% (3/790) | 100% (0/709) |
| Mothur + Consension | |||||
| ONT | 98.6% (10/726) | 99.2% (6/741) | 99.9% (1/731) | 99.5% (4/790) | 100% (0/709) |
| PB | 98.6% (10/726) | 99.2% (6/741) | 99.7% (2/731) | 99.6% (3/790) | 100% (0/709) |
The highest similarity scores are highlighted in bold. The numbers in the brackets provide the amount of mismatches to the Sanger reference and the length of the reference sequence.