Table 1.
Technology | Applications | Examples of successful applications |
---|---|---|
Genomic sequencing |
|
Identification of new LSDs caused by mutation of the VPS33A (Pavlova et al, 2019) and VPS16 (Steel et al, 2020) genes |
Transcriptomic analysis |
|
Similarities between the microglia expression profiles of LSDs (mucolipidosis type IV mouse and Niemann‐Pick disease type C1) with common neurodegenerative disorders (Cougnoux et al, 2019) |
Genome‐wide association studies |
|
Identification of a c.510C > T variant that may be predictive of clinical course and outcome in late‐onset Pompe disease patients (Bergsma et al, 2019) |
microRNA sequencing |
|
Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs potentially predictive of disease severity in Pompe disease (Tarallo et al, 2019) |
Biochemical and metabolomic analyses |
|
Identification of disease biomarkers for several LSDs (Boutin & Auray‐Blais, 2015; Reunert et al, 2015; Polo et al, 2019) Development of methods for simultaneous detection of multiple enzyme activities in dried blood spots suitable for newborn screening programs for several LSDs (Anderson, 2018; Donati et al, 2018; Kumar et al, 2019; Lukacs et al, 2019; Scott et al, 2020) |
Cell‐based assays and high‐content imaging technologies |
|
Development of multiplex staining assays that allow screening of FDA‐approved compounds and identification of correctors for cellular phenotypes of LSDs (Pipalia et al, 2006; Pugach et al, 2018) |
Targeted gene knock‐out and genome editing—iPSc |
|
CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated generation of knock‐out models of LSDs, such as sphingolipidoses and Niemann‐Pick disease type C (Santos & Amaral, 2019) |
Organellar omics |
|
Identification of lysosomal proteome and interactome (Sleat et al, 2005; Abu‐Remaileh et al, 2017; Thelen et al, 2017; Rabanal‐Ruiz & Korolchuk, 2018) |