Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;18:26. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00800-4

Table 1.

Baseline demographic, clinical characteristics, and individual training goals for the AANmDOF robotic and conventional gait training groups (mean ± SD or number)

AANmDOF robotic
n = 17
Conventional
n = 15
Sex, male/female (n) 10/7 10/5
Age (years) 60.6 ± 9.3 56.8 ± 9.8
Height (cm) 177.4 ± 7.6 177.7 ± 7.5
Weight (kg) 80.8 ± 16.0 79.3 ± 14.3
Type of stroke, ischemic/haemorrhagic (n) 13/4 11/4
Time since stroke (wks) 5.4 ± 1.8 5.9 ± 2.1
Hemiparetic side, left/right (n) 7/10 7/8
Use of ankle–foot orthosis (n) 8 6
FAC score (n)
 3 10 6
 4 6 8
 5 1 1
Fugl Meyer Assessment—leg score 24.2 ± 4.6 23.4 ± 6.8
Motricity Index—leg score 63.9 ± 17.0 62.5 ± 26.4
HADS—subscale depression 1.8 ± 1.5 1.2 ± 0.9
MoCA 24.1 ± 4.2 23.4 ± 4.1
UCO—subscale conversation (n)
 4 0 2
 5 17 13
Individual training goal (n)
 Foot clearance 6 6
 Knee stability 6 7
 Limb loading 4 2
 Foot prepositioning 1 0

FAC score Functional Ambulation Category (range 0–5), Fugl Meyer Assessment-leg score (range 0–34), Motricity Index leg score (range 0–100), HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-subscale depression (range 0–21), MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment (range 0–30), UCO Utrechts Communicatie Onderzoek-subscale conversation (range 1–5)