Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Dec 22;7(5):10.1002/adhm.201700897. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700897

Table 5.

Comparison of reviewed biomaterials.

Material In vitroa) In vivo Clinical Pros Cons Cell adherence Nontoxic, noninflammatory Biodegradable Mechanical properties Cost-effective
Application Products
Collagen *** *** *** Integra, OrCel, Promogran, PurAply Highest similarity to dermis ECM Needs crosslinking, expensive, acidic pH of aqueous solutions *** *** *** ** *
Gelatin ** ** Cheap, very similar structure to collagen fibers in dermis Needs crosslinking, forms gel at physiologic temperature *** *** *** ** ***
Elastin ** ** * As a modification for collagen in MatriDerm Mimicking elastic fibers in native dermis Needs crosslinking, expensive *** *** *** ** *
Fibrin ** ** * As tissue glue or sealant (like TISSEEL, EVICEL, Beriplast) and for cell spraying Possibility to have autologous fibrin toward preventing immune response Needs crosslinking, significant shrinkage, hard to control its structure, weak mechanical properties, fast degradation, expensive *** *** *** * *
HA ** ** ** HYAFF, Laserskin, Hayalomatrix Mimicking HA present in native dermis Needs crosslinking, weak mechanical properties, expensive *** *** *** * *
PLA * * Reproducible physical and mechanical properties Slow degradation rate, acidic degradation products, low elongation, hydrophobicity ** ** ** *** ***
PLGA * * Faster degradation rate than PLA, reproducible physical and mechanical properties Acidic degradation products ** ** ** *** ***
PCL ** * Reproducible physical and mechanical properties Slower degradation rate (even than PLA and PLGA) ** ** ** *** ***
PEG * Reproducible physical and mechanical properties No cell interaction, very slow degradation * ** ** ** ***
PU * * Reproducible physical and mechanical properties, high elasticity Slow degradation ** ** ** *** ***
SA Peptides * * Reproducible physical and mechanical properties weak mechanical properties, expensive ** *** ** * *
Chitosan ** * Antibacterial, antifungal, mucoadhesive, analgesic and hemostatic, cheap Needs crosslinking, ** *** *** ** ***
Dextran * * Needs crosslinking, expensive ** ** *** ** ***
Pullulan * * Antioxidant, biodegradable Weak cell interaction, Needs crosslinking, * ** *** ** ***
a)

Frequency of application (in vitro or in vivo) and biomaterial score in different criteris are shown with a range from low (*) to high (***).