Table 5.
Comparison of reviewed biomaterials.
Material | In vitroa) | In vivo | Clinical | Pros | Cons | Cell adherence | Nontoxic, noninflammatory | Biodegradable | Mechanical properties | Cost-effective | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Application | Products | ||||||||||
Collagen | *** | *** | *** | Integra, OrCel, Promogran, PurAply | Highest similarity to dermis ECM | Needs crosslinking, expensive, acidic pH of aqueous solutions | *** | *** | *** | ** | * |
Gelatin | ** | ** | – | Cheap, very similar structure to collagen fibers in dermis | Needs crosslinking, forms gel at physiologic temperature | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | |
Elastin | ** | ** | * | As a modification for collagen in MatriDerm | Mimicking elastic fibers in native dermis | Needs crosslinking, expensive | *** | *** | *** | ** | * |
Fibrin | ** | ** | * | As tissue glue or sealant (like TISSEEL, EVICEL, Beriplast) and for cell spraying | Possibility to have autologous fibrin toward preventing immune response | Needs crosslinking, significant shrinkage, hard to control its structure, weak mechanical properties, fast degradation, expensive | *** | *** | *** | * | * |
HA | ** | ** | ** | HYAFF, Laserskin, Hayalomatrix | Mimicking HA present in native dermis | Needs crosslinking, weak mechanical properties, expensive | *** | *** | *** | * | * |
PLA | * | * | – | Reproducible physical and mechanical properties | Slow degradation rate, acidic degradation products, low elongation, hydrophobicity | ** | ** | ** | *** | *** | |
PLGA | * | * | – | Faster degradation rate than PLA, reproducible physical and mechanical properties | Acidic degradation products | ** | ** | ** | *** | *** | |
PCL | ** | * | – | Reproducible physical and mechanical properties | Slower degradation rate (even than PLA and PLGA) | ** | ** | ** | *** | *** | |
PEG | * | – | – | Reproducible physical and mechanical properties | No cell interaction, very slow degradation | * | ** | ** | ** | *** | |
PU | * | * | – | Reproducible physical and mechanical properties, high elasticity | Slow degradation | ** | ** | ** | *** | *** | |
SA Peptides | * | * | – | Reproducible physical and mechanical properties | weak mechanical properties, expensive | ** | *** | ** | * | * | |
Chitosan | ** | * | – | Antibacterial, antifungal, mucoadhesive, analgesic and hemostatic, cheap | Needs crosslinking, | ** | *** | *** | ** | *** | |
Dextran | * | * | – | Needs crosslinking, expensive | ** | ** | *** | ** | *** | ||
Pullulan | * | * | – | Antioxidant, biodegradable | Weak cell interaction, Needs crosslinking, | * | ** | *** | ** | *** |
Frequency of application (in vitro or in vivo) and biomaterial score in different criteris are shown with a range from low (*) to high (***).