Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2020 May 14;51(15):2637–2646. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001191

Table 3.

Distribution of and correlations between resilience measures among the analytic sample (N=1,429)

Absence of Distress Absence of Distress plus Positive Functioning Relative Resilience
Resilience Measure Definition or Determination r r r
Perceived Trait Resilience Total Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC 10) sum score; higher scores indicate more resilience 0.354 0.366 0.272
Absence of Distress Categorizing individuals as resilient based on absence of current clinically elevated depressive and PTSD symptoms, else non-resilient -- 0.691 0.500
Absence of Distress plus Positive Functioning Categorizing individuals as resilient based on absence of current clinically elevated depressive and PTSD symptoms AND presence of high positive affect, else non-resilient -- -- 0.320
Relative Resilience Total sum of the inverse of standardized residuals for depressive and PTSD symptoms predicted by continuous child abuse score; inverse residuals indicate better psychological functioning relative to child abuse burden, thus higher scores indicate more resilience -- -- --

Cell entries are N (percentages) of those classified as “resilient” or mean (standard deviations) for each resilience measure among the entire sample; and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between each resilience measure. All correlations are statistically significant at p<.05.