Table 7.
Linear model of change in self-reported ‘lockdown compliance’ between waves 2 and 3 (high scores = less ‘compliance’)
Coeff. | Std error | P-value | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 1.28 | 0.61 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 2.47 |
Knowledge about COVID-19 at wave 2 | − 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.93 | − 0.30 | 0.27 |
Deterrence (perceived chance of police intervention in the event of non-compliance) at wave 2a | − 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.27 | − 0.33 | 0.09 |
Perceived legal legitimacy at wave 2a | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.31 | − 0.13 | 0.42 |
Perceived police legitimacy at wave 2a | − 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.85 | − 0.32 | 0.26 |
Social norms regarding social distancing at wave 2a | − 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.29 | − 0.34 | 0.10 |
Expressive function of the law at wave 2a | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.49 |
Functional worry about catching COVID-19 at wave 2 | − 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.74 | − 0.35 | 0.49 |
Dysfunctional worry about catching COVID-19 at wave 2 | − 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.92 | − 0.31 | 0.34 |
Knowledge about COVID-19 at wave 3 | − 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.96 | − 0.30 | 0.28 |
Deterrence (perceived chance of police intervention in the event of non-compliance) at wave 3a | − 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.08 | − 0.36 | 0.02 |
Perceived legal legitimacy at wave 3a | − 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.20 | − 0.48 | 0.10 |
Perceived police legitimacy at wave 3a | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.12 | − 0.07 | 0.56 |
Social norms regarding social distancing at wave 3a | − 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.84 | − 0.24 | 0.19 |
Expressive function of the law at wave 3a | − 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.01 | − 0.50 | − 0.07 |
Age gender interaction: 16–24 femaleb | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.25 | − 0.28 | 1.08 |
25–44 maleb | − 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.75 | − 0.73 | 0.53 |
25–44 femaleb | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.37 | − 0.31 | 0.85 |
45–64 maleb | − 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.74 | − 0.89 | 0.63 |
45–64 femaleb | − 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.16 | − 1.19 | 0.19 |
65 + maleb | − 0.59 | 0.91 | 0.52 | − 2.37 | 1.20 |
65 + femaleb | − 0.09 | 0.70 | 0.90 | − 1.47 | 1.29 |
City: Cardiffc | − 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.08 | − 1.36 | 0.08 |
Edinburghc | − 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.40 | − 0.99 | 0.40 |
Glasgowc | 0.01 | 0.36 | 0.98 | − 0.69 | 0.72 |
Leedsc | 0.62 | 0.36 | 0.08 | − 0.08 | 1.33 |
Liverpoolc | − 0.09 | 0.37 | 0.80 | − 0.82 | 0.63 |
Londonc | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.65 | − 0.44 | 0.71 |
Manchesterc | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.20 | − 0.24 | 1.16 |
Newcastlec | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.36 | − 0.40 | 1.10 |
Sheffieldc | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.22 | − 0.27 | 1.20 |
None of thesec | − 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.91 | − 0.81 | 0.72 |
Linear regression model estimated using Stata 15. Source: Waves 2 and 3 of Policing the pandemic. Total n = 1980
OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
aComponent scores saved from principal components analysis
bReference category: 16–24 male
cReference category: Birmingham