Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 20;21(3):704. doi: 10.3390/s21030704

Table 6.

Comparison with different studies for posture and bedside event recognition.

Sensor(s) Source Accuracy Precision Sensitivity Specificity
Infrared fence [38] N/A N/A 85.3% 96.2%
Pressure mat [38] N/A N/A 90.4% 99.3%
Pressure sensor [39] N/A N/A 96% 95.5%
CBD This study 85.9% 78.6% 98.9% 73.0%
Infrared fence and multiple pressure mats [38] N/A N/A 92.3% 99.4%
Thermal array and ultrasonic sensor [40] 95.5% 93.8% 71.4% 99.3%
RFID [31] N/A N/A 93.8% 90.8%
Kinect [41] # 98.8% N/A N/A N/A
eNightLog This study * 99.0% 99.2% 98.8% 99.2%

# Patient get up from the bed event; * Single bed laboratory setting. CBD—conventional bed exiting detection system.