Table 1.
Therapy | Compared to | Route and Number of Administrations | Burn Characteristics | Follow Up | # of Patients | Age Range [Years] | Result | Author | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autologous keratinocytes | |||||||||
cultured epithelium | NA | grafts placed on a wound bed | major burns | NA | 2 | 5–6 | permanent epidermis generation | Gallico et al. [24] | 1984 |
cultured autologous epidermis | NA | NA | second-and third-degree burn wounds | up to 4 years | 17 | NA | less hypertrophic scar formation | Teepe et al. [25] | 1990 |
CEA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 104 | NA | final take rate of about 60% | Odessey et al. [26] | 1992 |
cultured autologous keratinocytes | without graft | grafts | massive burns | NA | 64 (22–AT, 42–CT) | NA | mortality rate reduced from 48 to 14% | Munster et al. [27] | 1996 |
sole-derived CEA | Axilla-; groin- or foreskin-derived CEA | grafts | full-thickness burn wounds or giant congenital nevi | 3,5 years | 12 | 0–17 | re-expression of K9 after grafting on muscle fascia | Compton et al. [28] | 1998 |
CEA/CellSpray/ CEA + CellSpray | NA | application to the wound bed | burns > 50% TBSA | NA | 62 | 30–49 | reduction on surgical intervention and total length of stay in hospital | Wood et al. [21] | 2006 |
CEA/A | NA | application to the wound bed | large burns | 3–90 months | 88 | 0.5–73 | the mean final take rate 72.7% | Sood et al. [22] | 2010 |
CEA | NA | application to the wound bed | burns | NA | 63 | 2–70 | good outcome associated with young age and low number of infectious complications | Cirodde et al. [34] | 2011 |
STSG + cultured autologous keratinocytes | cultured autologous keratinocytes alone, STSG alone | application to the wound bed | full-thickness skin burn, 55–65% TBSA | NA | 20 | 4–12 | accelerated wound closure, better esthetical results | Chrapusta et al. [30] | 2014 |
CEA | non-CEA | mean 2,1 applications to the wound bed | burns; 60–80% of the TBSA | NA | 177 (CEA: 96; non-CEA: 81) | NA | improved survival | Kym et al. [33] | 2015 |
CAE only and CAE after allogeneic cultured epidermis application | NA | grafts, in extensive burns in combination with large meshed STSG (1:6–1:12) | STSG donor sites and deep second-degree burns | NA | 63 | 0.75–58 | increased surface of the epidermal barrier | Auxefans et al. [29] | 2015 |
CEA with a wide split auto mesh graft or patch graft | NA | 1 application | severe burns | NA | 5 | 13–28 | excellent epithelialization | Matsumura et al. [31] | 2016 |
STSG + CEA | micrografting + CEA | grafts | severe burns | NA | STSG + CEA: 10; micrografting + CEA: 14 |
NA | significantly lower average area amount of skin used in the micrografting group | Chua et al. [35] | 2018 |
CEA + widely meshed STSG (meshing ratio 1:3)/ Cuono method/ CEA only |
NA | an average of 8 sheets of CEA | burns ≥ 35% TBSA | 12 months | 12 (32 sites) | 22–67 | combination of STSG and CEA increases wound closure and improves CEA take rate | Lo et al. [36] | 2019 |
CEA | NA | NA | burns | NA | 954 | <1–>80 | increased survival rate when combined with STSG | Hickerson et al. [37] | 2019 |
Products based on autologous keratinocytes | |||||||||
Epicel® | NA | grafts | burns | NA | 30 | 2.5–70 | very high beneficial value in the management of burns > 60% TBSA | Carsin et al. [39] | 2000 |
ReCell® | skin grafts | spray | deep partial-thickness burns | 6 months | 82 (ReCell®–42, skin grafting–40) | NA | ReCell®gives similar results and is less invasive than skin grafting | Gravante et al. [44] | 2007 |
Keraheal™ | NA | spray; combined with 1:4–6 mesh graft | extensive burns | 24 weeks | 29 | 30–49 | CEA’s take rate 100% after 4 weeks; enhanced take rate of a wide meshed autograft | Yim et al. [41] | 2011 |
Keraheal™ | NA | spray; combined with 6:1 mesh graft when burn over 40% TBSA | full-thickness skin wound, TBSA 30–70% | up to 39 months | 16 | 18–70 | CEA’s take 68% after 4 weeks, 90.0% after 8 weeks | Lee et al. [13] | 2012 |
Biobrane® with or without ReCell® | local standard treatment with surgery at 10 days | application to the wound bed | a pediatric partial-thickness scald injury | until 6 months post-burn | 13 (Biobrane® only-4; Biobrane® and ReCell® –5; CT –4) | Biobrane®only: 1.5–8.8; Biobrane® and ReCell®:0.8–1.8; CT: 2.5–7.1 | the best outcome when Biobrane® combined with ReCell®; decreased healing time, less pain, and better scar outcomes | Wood et al. [45] | 2012 |
ReCell® | STSG | spray | partial-thickness burns | 52 weeks | 10 | NA | decreased donor site size, comparable outcomes with MSTSG treatment | Sood et al. [47] | 2015 |
JACE® CEA | NA | grafts | burns > 30% TBSA | 52 weeks | 216 | 0–99 | increased survival rate | Matsumura et al. [50] | 2016 |
JACE® CEA on meshed 3:1 split-thickness dermis graft or meshed 6:1 split-thickness autograft | NA | application to the wound bed | massive burns | NA | 3 | 51–66 | almost all of the burn wounds had healed at 6 weeks after surgery | Hayashi et al. [48] | 2018 |
Autologous engineered skin | |||||||||
cultured autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts | NA | grafts | full-thickness burn wounds | 4 weeks | 4 | 20–53 | advance in the care of extensively burned patients | Hansbrough et al. [51] | 1989 |
autologous TESE (cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts) | NA | sheet | third-degree burn wounds | up to 9 months | 4 | 29–63 | appropriate for permanent repair of full-thickness skin defects | Takami et al. [53] | 2004 |
CSS (autologous cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts) | STSG | grafts, CSS were meshed at a ratio of 1:1.5 and applied weekly | full-thickness Burns | 2 to 7 years in 9 patients | 40 | 0.6–17 | better pigmentation, less scaring; no differences in qualitative outcomes after 1 year | Boyce et al. [52] | 2006 |