Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;55(2):415–425. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00230-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of Participating Companies and Respondents (n = 20).

Respondent ID Type of Products Company Produces Size of Company Does Company Use Structured Benefit–Risk Assessment? Does Company have a Standard Operating Procedure for Structured Benefit–Risk Assessment? Has Company used qBRA to Support Product Development?a
01 Biotechnology Medium Yes Yes No
02 Medical devices Large Yes No Yesa
03 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes No Yes
04 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yes
05 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yesa
06 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yes
07 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yes
08 Medical devices Medium Yes Yes Yes
09 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yes
10 Biotechnology Large Yes Yes Yes
11 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes No
12 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yes
13 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes No Yes
14 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes No Yesa
15 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes Yes Yes
16 Medical devices Large No No Yes
17 Pharmaceuticals Large Yes No Yes
18 Pharmaceuticals Large No No No
19 Biotechnology Medium Yes Yes No
20 Pharmaceuticals Medium Yes Yes No

aIn some instances, respondents responded to the direct question regarding whether their company had used qBRA by answering “no.” However, later in the survey, they indicated that one or more qBRA methods had been used in some capacity. In those instances, the original response was re-categorized as a “Yes*”