Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;12:832. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21099-2

Fig. 7. Interferon β and γ promote Gal-9 expression and secretion.

Fig. 7

a Baseline expression of Gal-9 protein in cancer cell lines. L, M, and S denote the three common Gal-9 isoforms resulting from alternative pre-mRNA splicing. b Regulation of Gal-9 expression in A375 human melanoma cells by indicated inflammatory cytokines at protein (left) or mRNA (right) levels. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Statistical differences were assessed using ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. NS, not significant; ***P < 0.001. Control vs IFNβ, P = 0.0002; control vs IFNγ, P = 0.9940. c–g The effects of IFNβ and IFNγ on Gal-9 expression in cell lines of multiple cancer types and primary macrophages. hk The effects of IFNβ and IFNγ on Gal-9 secretion from tumor cells and immune cells. h A375 melanoma cells. n = 3 independent experiments. Control vs IFNβ, P = 0.0074; IFNβ vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P = 0.0388; control vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P = 0.0070. i THP-1 monocytic leukemia cells. n = 6 independent experiments. Control vs IFNβ, P < 0.0001; control vs IFNγ, P < 0.0001; IFNβ vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P < 0.0001; IFNγ vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P < 0.0001. j Lung cancer cell lines. n = 3 independent experiments. Control vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P < 0.0001 for all the cell lines. k Primary macrophages. n = 3 independent experiments. Control vs IFNβ, P = 0.0117; IFNβ vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P = 0.0395; control vs IFNβ + IFNγ, P = 0.0099. l Expression correlation of LGALS9 with ISGs in the TCGA BRCA dataset and all cancer cell lines in CCLE, as analyzed by linear regression (Pearson correlation with two-tailed p-values). Unpaired two-tailed t tests were used for comparing means between treatment groups in (hk). Each circle represents one experiment. Error bars represent SD. Data shown in (ag) are representative of three independent experiments.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure