Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;13(3):419. doi: 10.3390/polym13030419

Table 3.

Comparison of adsorption capacities of various absorbents used for BG removal.

Adsorbent Experimental Conditions Adsorption Capacity (mg/g) References
Red clay Co: 20–100 mg/L; pH: 7; t: 240 min; T: 45 °C 125 [6]
Poly(AN-co-VP)/zeolite Composite Co: 40.20 mg/L; m: 0.20 g/50 mL; t: 121.60 min 23.81 [34]
Nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite Co: 05–80 mg/L; t: 60 min; m: 0.9 g/L; pH: 7 49.1 [35]
Areca nut husk m: 10 g/L; pH: 7.0; Co: 50–200 mg/L; T: 298 K; agitation speed: 200 rpm 18.21 [43]
NaOH treated saw dust Co: 50–200 mg/L; pH: 2.9; t: 180 min; m: 4 g/L 58.48 [44]
Carboxy methyl cellulose/chitosan/graphene oxide Co: 2–12 mg/L; pH: 7; t: 350 min 1.90 [45]
GO-PANI Co: 25–200 mg/L; pH: 7; t: 30 min; T: 25 °C 142.85 This study