Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;104(2):612–621. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0249

Table 3.

Comparison of total blood culture yield and retrieval of B. pseudomallei and Salmonella Paratyphi A over different surveillance periods

Period 1 (2010–2015) Period 2 (2016–2018) Period 3 (2018–2019) Test for trend over time
Number of months of surveillance 66 24 16
Pathogen growth rate 10.7% 7.1%** 7.0% P < 0.001
Total number of cultures sampled 11,671 5,732 4,028
Mean per month 177 239** 252** P < 0.001
Total number of pathogens retrieved 1,087 387 277
Mean per month 16.5 16.1 17.3 P = 0.25
Retrieved on BS (% of all pathogens) 73 (6.7) 37 (9.6) 125 (45.1) ** P < 0.001
Total number of B. pseudomallei retrieved (% of all pathogens) 90 (8.3) 48 (12.4)** 12 (4.3)**
Mean per month 1.4 2.0* 0.8** P = 0.53
Retrieved on BS (% of all B. pseudomallei) 55 (55.6) 28 (56.0) 9 (75.0) P = 0.002
Total number of Salmonella Paratyphi A (% of all pathogens) 147 (13.5) 74 (19.1) 110 (39.7)
Mean per month 2.2 3.1* 6.9** P < 0.001
Retrieved on BS (% of all Salmonella Paratyphi A) 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 71 (65.5)** P < 0.001

BS = blind subculture; B. pseudomallei = Burkholderia pseudomallei. Pathogen growth rate was defined as proportion of blood cultures showing growth of a pathogen. Statistically significant differences with the previous surveillance period are indicated with asterisks (* = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.001). Logistic and Poisson regressions were used to detect a linear trend over time. This table shows that pathogen growth rate significantly declined in periods 2 and 3, but that the total number of pathogens retrieved remained stable. The total number of Salmonella Paratyphi A retrieved showed an increasing trend, whereas the total number of B. pseudomallei retrieved increased in period 2 but decreased significantly in period 3.