Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 30;22(3):1378. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031378

Table 1.

Summary of different STDP paradigms induced t-LTP at the hippocampal SC-CA1 synapses in 6-month-old C57Bl/6J and APP/PS1 mice.

STDP Paradigm (Presyn. Stim.: Postsyn. AP) No. of Repeats, Frequency Normalized t-LTP Magnitude (EPSP Slope %)
C57Bl/6J Mice WT Littermates APP/PS1 Mice
0:0 (negative control) 106.9 ± 7.7% (n = 11/N = 10)
1 EPSP:4 AP 6×, 0.5 Hz 157.9 ± 14.2% (n = 11/N = 8) *,# 153.8 ± 13.5% (n = 13/N = 7) * 138.9 ± 8.7% (n = 12/N = 6) *
1 EPSP:1 AP 6×, 0.5 Hz 134.3 ± 7.5% (n = 13/N = 10) *
1 EPSP:4 AP 35×, 2 Hz 139.1 ± 9.5% (n = 10/N = 10) *#
1 EPSP:1 AP 100×, 2 Hz 142.0 ± 7.9% (n = 13/N = 12) *# 130.9 ± 8.5% (n = 11/N = 5) * 157.3 ± 14.9% (n = 9/N = 5) *
Aβ Plaque Staining (Methoxy-X04)
WT littermates APP/PS1, cells near to Aβ (<200 µm) APP/PS1, cells distant from Aβ (>200 µm)
1 EPSP:4 AP 6×, 0.5 Hz 135.8 ± 10.6% (n = 16/N = 9) * 92.4 ± 9.1% (n = 12/N = 9) # 129.6 ± 9.6% (n = 8/N = 4) *
Chronic Fingolimod Treatment of APP/PS1 Mice
WT littermates + fingolimod AD near + Fingolimod
1 EPSP:4 AP 6×, 0.5 Hz 169.9 ± 20.1% (n = 12/N = 7) * 111.1 ± 10.2% (n = 16/N = 7)

n: number of experiments/slices, N: number of animals, * p < 0.05, one-sample t-test (significant t-LTP compared to its own baseline); # p < 0.05, ANOVA 6× 1:4 vs. 0:0 WT; 35× 1:4 vs. 0:0 WT, 100× 1:1 vs. 0:0 WT; APP/PS1 near Aβ vs. WT littermates.