Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 25;9(2):1070–1078. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2081

TABLE 5.

Antinutritional factors (dry weight basis) in leaves of three sweetpotato varieties in Kenya as influenced by processing methods

Variety Processing method Oxalates (mg/100g) Tannins (g/100 g) Phytic acid (g/100 g)
Kabode Boiling 1,399.67 ± 16.72e 2.85 ± 0.30h 0.41 ± 0.01d
Dehydration 1,321.90 ± 258.51f 2.69 ± 0.01hi 0.30 ± 0.28de
Fermentation & dehydration 1,325.13 ± 181.28f 3.84 ± 0.14g 0.13 ± 0.09h
Raw 1,820.56 ± 53.45a 6.95 ± 0.42bc 0.58 ± 0.17bc
Whitesp Boiling 1,468.80 ± 344.77d 5.35 ± 0.21d 0.74 ± 0.54b
Dehydration 1,690.56 ± 27.63c 5.08 ± 0.48de 0.67 ± 0.16b
Fermentation & dehydration 1,107.36 ± 174.75gh 4.94 ± 0.14e 0.49 ± 0.15d
Raw 1,737.20 ± 70.69b 7.81 ± 0.99b 1.07 ± 0.18a
Yellowsp Boiling 1,341.63 ± 25.22ef 6.67 ± 0.25c 0.46 ± 0.24d
Dehydration 1,312.50 ± 283.59fg 7.32 ± 0.43bc 0.24 ± 0.20fg
Fermentation & dehydration 913.96 ± 109.97h 4.19 ± 0.14f 0.28 ± 0.07f
Raw 1,347.66 ± 69.84ef 11.79 ± 0.57a 0.55 ± 0.26bc

Results are means of triplicate samples ± standard deviation; values with similar superscript letters in the same column are not significantly different at p ≤ .05.