Table 1.
Study element | AL | TT | HW | SS | SM | SH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parasite studieda (n = 267) | 24% (n = 213) | 22% (n = 194) | 21% (n = 197) | 9% (n = 78) | 22% (n = 198) | 2% (n = 21) | |
Diagnostic | KK and/or FECT | 107 | 101 | 95 | 24 | 125 | 15 |
Otherb | 70 | 59 | 68 | 35 | 45 | 5 | |
Multipleb | 21 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 0 | |
Unspecified | 15 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 1 | |
Treatment | PZQ/ALB/MBZ | 46 | 44 | 38 | 8 | 59 | 7 |
Not specified | 117 | 106 | 112 | 48 | 97 | 14 | |
Not mentioned | 50 | 44 | 47 | 22 | 42 | 0 | |
Study population | Pre-SAC | 19 | 16 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 0 |
SAC | 128 | 118 | 120 | 37 | 120 | 18 | |
Community | 66 | 60 | 62 | 38 | 69 | 3 | |
Epidemiological parameter | Prevalence | 213 | 194 | 197 | 78 | 198 | 21 |
Intensity | 46 | 44 | 41 | – | 70 | – |
AL Ascaris lumbricoides, TT Trichuris trichiura, HW hookworm, SS Strongyloides stercoralis, SM Schistosoma mansoni, SH Schistosoma haematobium, KK Kato–Katz, FECT formal ether concentration technique, PZQ praziquantel, ALB albendazole, MBZ mebendazole, Pre-SAC pre-school-aged children
aPercentage of papers that studied each parasite out of the 267 datasets
bIncludes direct microscopy, McMaster, molecular techniques [polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR], FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC techniques, centrifugation, sedimentation and urine diagnostics