Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;14:97. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04600-0

Table 1.

Breakdown of the selected 231 papers. The number of papers reporting the diagnostic, treatment, study population and epidemiological parameters are shown for each parasite species

Study element AL TT HW SS SM SH
Parasite studieda (n = 267) 24% (n = 213) 22% (n = 194) 21% (n = 197) 9% (n = 78) 22% (n = 198) 2% (n = 21)
Diagnostic KK and/or FECT 107 101 95 24 125 15
Otherb 70 59 68 35 45 5
Multipleb 21 19 19 9 13 0
Unspecified 15 15 15 10 15 1
Treatment PZQ/ALB/MBZ 46 44 38 8 59 7
Not specified 117 106 112 48 97 14
Not mentioned 50 44 47 22 42 0
Study population Pre-SAC 19 16 15 3 9 0
SAC 128 118 120 37 120 18
Community 66 60 62 38 69 3
Epidemiological parameter Prevalence 213 194 197 78 198 21
Intensity 46 44 41 70

AL Ascaris lumbricoides, TT Trichuris trichiura, HW hookworm, SS Strongyloides stercoralis, SM Schistosoma mansoni, SH Schistosoma haematobium, KK Kato–Katz, FECT formal ether concentration technique, PZQ praziquantel, ALB albendazole, MBZ mebendazole, Pre-SAC pre-school-aged children

aPercentage of papers that studied each parasite out of the 267 datasets

bIncludes direct microscopy, McMaster, molecular techniques [polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR], FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC techniques, centrifugation, sedimentation and urine diagnostics