Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 30;10(3):490. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030490

Table 1.

Results from univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and BMI of prognostic factors associated with overall survival.

Univariate Analyses
(Adjusted for Age, Gender, BMI)
Multivariate Analysis
(Adjusted for Age, Gender, BMI)
Variable Mean (SD) or
Frequency (%)
Hazard Ratio [95%-C] p-Value Hazard Ratio [95%-CI] p-Value
Age 66 (10) 1.024
[1.002, 1.047]
0.0356
Gender
female
80 (48.19) 1.173
[0.789, 1.745]
0.4297
male 86 (51.81)
BMI 25.7 (4.3) 0.996
[0.954, 1.040]
0.8547
ASA
<3
62 (37.35) 0.909
[0.607, 1.362]
0.6449
≥3 104 (62.65)
Tumour grade
G2
94 (56.63) 1.954
[1.342, 2.844]
0.0005
G3 72 (56.63)
Extent of tumour
T1/T2
26 (15.66) 2.116
[1.015, 4.410]
0.0455
T3/T4 140 (84.34)
Perineural invasion
Absent
28 (16.87) 2.239
[1.265, 3.961]
0.0056 2.409
[1.337, 4.340]
0.0034
Present 138 (83.13)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent
39 (23.49) 2.322
[1.407, 3.834]
0.0010
Present 127 (76.51)
Lymphatic invasion
Absent
114 (68.67) 2.080
[0.418, 3.050]
0.0002 1.763
[1.173, 2.651]
0.0064
Present 52 (31.33)
Venous invasion
Absent
136 (81.93) 1.452
[0.923, 2.284]
0.1068
Present 30 (81.93)
Surgical margin status
Negative
106 (63.86) 1.962
[1.342, 2.868]
0.0005
Positive 60 (36.14)
Nerve fiber density
High
72 (43.37) 1.597
[1.093, 2.336]
0.0155 1.676
[1.126, 2.495]
0.0109
Low 94 (56.63)
Lymphoid Aggregates
<5
95 (57.23) 1.084
[0.745, 1.577]
0.6723
≥5 71 (42.77)
Tumor cellularity 0.36 (0.20) 5.280
[1.952, 14.282]
0.0010 4.287
[1.460, 12.589]
0.0081
Interaction between Lymph node metastasis and surgical margin status 0.0053
lymph node metastasis present at surgical margin status positive 0.587
[0.272, 1.266]
lymph node metastasis present at surgical margin status negative 2.618
[1.260, 5.437]