Table 4.
Chi-square analysis with Yates correction for categorized variables
| Categorization | Frequency (%) | χ2 | P value | Contingency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients diagnosed COVID-19 | No patients diagnosed COVID-19 | ||||
| Less than 100 new cases/mo | 50 (50.5) | 49 (49.5) | |||
| 100 new cases or more/mo | 16 (59.3) | 11 (40.7) | |||
| Total | 66 (52.4) | 60 (47.6) | 0.348 | .555 | 0.052 |
| Patients diagnosed COVID-19 | No patients diagnosed COVID-19 | ||||
| Not predominantly SUS | 34 (65.4) | 18 (34.6) | |||
| Predominantly SUS | 32 (43.2) | 42 (56.8) | |||
| Total | 66 (52.4) | 60 (47.6) | 5.147 | .023 | 0.198 |
| Employee diagnosed with COVID-19 | No employee diagnosed with COVID-19 | ||||
| Less than 100 new cases/mo | 51 (51.5) | 48 (48.5) | |||
| 100 new cases or more/mo | 16 (59.3) | 11 (40.7) | |||
| Total | 67 (53.2) | 59 (46.8) | 0.247 | .619 | 0.044 |
| Employee diagnosed with COVID-19 | No employee diagnosed with COVID-19 | ||||
| Not predominantly SUS | 34 (65.4) | 18 (34.6) | |||
| Predominantly SUS | 33 (44.6) | 41 (55.4) | |||
| Total | 67 (53.2) | 59 (46.8) | 4.499 | .033 | 0.186 |
| Drop in care above 20% | No drop in care above 20% | ||||
| Less than 100 new cases/mo | 63 (63.6) | 36 (36.4) | |||
| 100 new cases or more/mo | 14 (51.9) | 13 (48.1) | |||
| Total | 77 (61.1) | 49 (38.9) | 0.793 | .373 | 0.079 |
| Drop in care above 20% | No drop in care above 20% | ||||
| Not predominantly SUS | 32 (61.5) | 20 (38.5) | |||
| Predominantly SUS | 45 (60.8) | 29 (39.2) | |||
| Total | 77 (61.1) | 49 (38.9) | 0.010 | .917 | 0.009 |
| Indication of hypofractionation | No indication of hypofractionation | ||||
| Less than 100 new cases/mo | 78 (78.8) | 21 (21.2) | |||
| 100 new cases or more/mo | 20 (74.1) | 7 (25.9) | |||
| Total | 98 (77.8) | 28 (22.2) | 0.068 | .794 | 0.023 |
| Indication of hypofractionation | No indication of hypofractionation | ||||
| Not predominantly SUS | 43 (82.7) | 9 (17.3) | |||
| Predominantly SUS | 55 (74.3) | 19 (25,7) | |||
| Total | 98 (77.8) | 28 (22.2) | 0.800 | .370 | 0.079 |
| Team rotation | No team rotation | ||||
| Less than 100 new cases/mo | 36 (36.4) | 63 (63.6) | |||
| 100 new cases or more/mo | 8 (29.6) | 19 (70.4) | |||
| Total | 44 (34.9) | 82 (65.1) | 0.179 | .672 | 0.037 |
| Team rotation | No team rotation | ||||
| Not predominantly SUS | 20 (38.5) | 32 (61.5) | |||
| Predominantly SUS | 24 (32.4) | 50 (67.6) | |||
| Total | 44 (34.9) | 82 (65.1) | 0.259 | .610 | 0.045 |
Abbreviation: SUS = Unified Health System.
The binomial variables of the χ2 analysis are presented in a 2 × 2 table, with number of patients and percentage (compared with overall number of patients) in each of the 4 squares, the row and column total count and percentage (compared with overall number of patients), and the P value for each analysis.