Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 31;14(3):655. doi: 10.3390/ma14030655

Table 4.

Statistical parameters of the experiments using CCD/RSM—evaluation of the effects.

Parameter Evaluation of the Effects, ∑Cu,Cd,Zn, mg/L, R2 = 0.9119, R2adj = 0.8532, 3 Parameters, 1 Block, 16 Experiments, MS = 0.1219
Effect Standard Error p-Value * −95% Confidence Interval +95% Confidence Interval Factor Standard Error of Factor Lower Confidence Interval Upper Confidence Interval
Constant Value 0.7197 0.2461 0.01693 0.1628 1.2765 0.7197 0.2461 0.1628 1.2765
pH (L) −1.5049 0.1889 0.00002 −1.9324 −1.0775 −0.7525 0.0945 −0.9662 −0.5388
pH (Q) 1.0509 0.2294 0.00133 0.5320 1.5699 0.5255 0.1147 0.2660 0.7850
Na2CS3 (L) −0.4548 0.1889 0.03942 −0.8823 −0.0274 −0.2274 0.0945 −0.4411 −0.0137
Na2CS3 (Q) 0.1706 0.2294 0.47608 −0.3484 0.6896 0.0853 0.1147 −0.1742 0.3448
Time (L) −0.0781 0.1889 0.68885 −0.5056 0.3493 −0.0391 0.0945 −0.2528 0.1746
Time (Q) 0.1529 0.2294 0.52178 −0.3660 0.6719 0.0765 0.1147 −0.1830 0.3359

L—linear effect; Q—quadratic effect; * statistically significant if p < 0.05. The analysis showed a significant (p < 0.05) influence of pH (L), pH (Q) and Na2CS2 (L) on the value of ∑Cu,Cd,Zn. Other parameters turned out to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05), including Time (L) and Time (Q). The calculated values of R2 = 0.9119 and R2adj = 0.8532 (91.19% and 85.32%, respectively) indicated that 91.19% of the variability of the dependent variable was explained by the model.