Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;21(3):971. doi: 10.3390/s21030971

Table 1.

BLE indoor positioning-related studies.

MAE (m) Experiment Area (m) Deployment Requirements Method and Reference
0.192 5×5 3 beacons Kalman/Gaussian filter, trilateration-centroid [10]
0.76 5.6×8.8 8 fixed beacons Hybrid, sliding window + KF, trilateration, DR [15]
0.8 10.5×15.6 22 fixed beacons BLE fingerprinting [22]
1.0 with 75% 8×8 4 beacons, 5 Wi-Fi AP Hybrid, SVM, KNN, ML cloud service [13]
1.27 90×37 48 fixed beacons Graph optimization, fingerprinting+range based [23]
1.37 8.4×15 BLE tags and 4 Repeater Hybrid (Wi − Fi + BLE), fingerprinting, CoO [14]
2 with 94% 30 m2 4 fixed beacons Selection of nearest BLE tag [16]
1.5 6×6 9 fixed beacons Trilateration, RSSI filtering [24]
μ:2.29, σ:1.67 15×16 1 beacon, 3 receivers OASLTIP
22 with 70.2% 5×5 4 fixed beacons, 1 receiver Two machine learning classifiers [20]
2.89 12×14 4 fixed beacons Trilateration, min-max, least square [9]
4.0 with 97.5% 8×6 5 beacons Particle filter, BLE fingerprinting [18]
4.6 with 90% 16.5×17.6 4 receivers, 1 beacon Channel diversity, weighted trilateration and KF [21]
1.5 with 91.4% 3 (1D) 1 beacon Low TX powered beacon utilization [17]
0.5 3 (1D) 1 beacon IPSAPP (A mobile application) [11]