Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):538. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030538

Table 2.

Radiomic prognostic index (RPI) in relation to clinicopathological patient characteristics in the study cohort (n = 95) and the MRI validation cohort (n = 82).

Study Cohort (n = 95) MRI Validation Cohort (n = 82)
Patients
(n)
High RPI
(n = 36)
Low RPI
(n = 59)
p-Value * Patients
(n)
High RPI
(n = 15)
Low RPI
(n = 67)
p-Value *
Age 0.54 0.59
<67 years 46 16 (44%) 30 (51%) 44 9 (60%) 35 (52%)
≥67 years 49 20 (56%) 29 (49%) 38 6 (40%) 32 (48%)
FIGO stage 0.06 0.03
I–II 82 28 (78%) 54 (91%) 67 9 (64%) 58 (88%)
III–IV 13 8 (22%) 5 (9%) 13 5 (36%) 8 (12%)
Histologic type 0.67 0.53
Endometrioid 76 28 (78%) 48 (81%) 65 11 (73%) 54 (81%)
Non-endometrioid 19 8 (22%) 11 (19%) 17 4 (27%) 13 (19%)
Histologic grade § 0.16 0.89
Grade 1–2 55 17 (47%) 38 (64%) 54 10 (67%) 44 (66%)
Grade 3 39 19 (53%) 20 (34%) 27 5 (33%) 22 (33%)
ND 1 1 (0%) 1 (2%) 1 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
Myometrial invasion 0.001 0.004
<50% 52 4 (27%) 48 (72%)
≥50% 47 10 (28%) 37 (63%) 28 10 (67%) 18 (27%)
ND 48 26 (72%) 22 (37%) 2 1 (6%) 1 (1%)
Lymph node metastases 0.31 0.02
No 76 27 (75%) 49 (83%) 56 6 (40%) 50 (75%)
Yes 10 6 (17%) 4 (7%) 9 4 (27%) 5 (7%)
ND 9 3 (8%) 6 (10%) 17 5 (33%) 12 (18%)

* p-values from Pearson’s chi-square; § endometrioid only; FIGO: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; ND: not determined.