Table 3.
Evaluation results obtained by using different numbers of weakly labeled subjects on the training set. The mean DC is presented in the way of mean ± standard deviation. The best result has been highlighted in italic.
Scale of the dataset | DC | P L | R L | F1 | DR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
79 subjects | 0.557 ± 0.250 | 0.793 | 0.741 | 0.766 | 0.922 |
159 subjects | 0.665 ± 0.181 | 0.854 | 0.872 | 0.863 | 0.966 |
238 subjects | 0.675 ± 0.138 | 0.843 | 0.901 | 0.871 | 1.000 |
318 subjects | 0.700 ± 0.134 | 0.821 | 0.920 | 0.867 | 1.000 |
398 subjects | 0.699 ± 0.128 | 0.852 | 0.923 | 0.886 | 1.000 |