Table 5.
Markers of kidney function, organ damage and inflammation (Means and standard deviations)
Control group | BW-WM group | BW-HA group | BW-HP group | ANOVA p |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serum creatinine (µmol/l) | 17.4 ± 1.1 | 17.0 ± 1.3 | 20.8 ± 4.0 | 18.0 ± 2.1 | 0.059 |
Serum cystatin C (ng/ml) | 2266 ± 452 | 2382 ± 311 | 2565 ± 334 | 2451 ± 323 | 0.57 |
Serum alanine transaminase (U/l) | 93 ± 37 | 98 ± 52 | 100 ± 21 | 86 ± 23 | 0.50 |
Serum aspartate transaminase (U/l) | 143 ± 52 | 192 ± 134 | 198 ± 53 | 143 ± 47 | 0.48 |
Urine creatinine (mmol/l) | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 3.9 ± 1.4 | 4.4 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 0.47 |
Urine total protein (g/mmol creatinine) | 3.5 ± 1.7 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 3.2 ± 1.4 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 0.81 |
Urine cystatin C (µg/mmol creatinine) | 1464 ± 891 | 1515 ± 175 | 1111 ± 323 | 1289 ± 298 | 0.55 |
Urine carbamide (mmol/mmol creatinine) | 342 ± 23a | 278 ± 36b | 200 ± 15c | 254 ± 15b | 8.3 × 10− 8 |
Urine uric acid (µmol/mmol creatinine) | 401 ± 41a | 360 ± 51ab | 293 ± 39b | 329 ± 49ab | 0.0066 |
Urine ammonium (µmol/mmol creatinine) | 40.0 ± 16.7a | 32.3 ± 9.0a | 20.4 ± 2.4b | 18.5 ± 2.3b | 0.0051 |
Plasma total glutathione (µmol/L) | 11 ± 2a | 17 ± 6b | 14 ± 2ab | 14 ± 2ab | 0.039 |
Plasma oxidized glutathione (µmol/L) | 6 ± 1a | 9 ± 3b | 7 ± 1ab | 8 ± 2ab | 0.049 |
Plasma reduced glutathione (µmol/L) | 5 ± 1 | 8 ± 3 | 7 ± 2 | 6 ± 2 | 0.33 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for N = 5 rats in the control group, N = 6 rats in the BW-WM group, N = 6 rats in the BW-HA group and N = 6 rats in the BW-HP group. p values are shown for the comparisons of BW-WM group, BW-HA group, BW-HP group and control group using one-way ANOVA and the p values in the table show results from the one-way ANOVA comparisons. Fisher’s LSD was used as post hoc test when appropriate, and different letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences between groups
BW-WM blue whiting whole meal, BW-HA blue whiting protein hydrolysate prepared with Alcalase®, BW-HP blue whiting protein hydrolysate prepared with Protamex®, WATepi epididymal white adipose tissue, ANOVA analysis of variance, LSD least significant difference
p < 0.05 was considered significant