Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;25(1):33–49. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02184-9

Table 11.

Multivariable analysis results for chronic pain requiring treatment at 1-year follow-up, including odds ratio estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals

Parameter p value Category p value (pairwise) OR estimate 95% CI
Age [10-Jahres-OR] < 0.001 0.787 0.756 0.819
Gender < 0.001 Female vs male 1.741 1.568 1.932
Preoperative pain < 0.001 Yes vs no < 0.001 1.943 1.717 2.198
Unknown vs no < 0.001 1.529 1.246 1.877
Yes vs unknown 0.011 1.271 1.056 1.529
EHS classification < 0.001 Lateral vs medial < 0.001 1.564 1.382 1.769
Combined vs medial < 0.001 1.376 1.159 1.635
Lateral vs combined 0.198 1.136 0.936 1.379
Postoperative complication < 0.001 Yes vs no 1.570 1.331 1.851
ASA score < 0.001 III/IV vs I < 0.001 1.804 1.465 2.221
II vs I < 0.001 1.448 1.204 1.741
III/IV vs II < 0.001 1.246 1.109 1.400
Risk factors < 0.001 Yes vs no 1.220 1.097 1.356
Drainage 0.002 Yes vs no 1.230 1.079 1.403
BMI [5-points-OR] 0.017 0.950 0.910 0.991
EHS width classification 0.035 W3 (> 10 cm) vs W1 (< 4 cm) 0.012 1.228 1.047 1.439
W2 (≥ 4–10 cm) vs W1 (< 4 cm) 0.067 1.122 0.992 1.270
W3 (> 10 cm) vs W2 (≥ 4–10 cm) 0.207 1.094 0.951 1.258
Procedure 0.102 Open—suture vs open—IPOM 0.032 0.794 0.643 0.981
Open—suture vs laparoscopic—IPOM 0.035 0.811 0.668 0.985
Open—IPOM vs open—sublay 0.064 1.157 0.991 1.351
Open—sublay vs laparoscopic—IPOM 0.107 0.883 0.759 1.027
Open—suture vs open—Onlay 0.363 0.884 0.677 1.153
Open—suture vs open—Sublay 0.389 0.919 0.759 1.113
Open—onlay vs open—IPOM 0.390 0.899 0.705 1.146
Open—onlay vs laparoscopic—IPOM 0.487 0.918 0.721 1.168
Open—onlay vs open—sublay 0.724 1.040 0.837 1.293
Open—IPOM vs laparoscopic—IPOM 0.808 1.021 0.860 1.213