Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Nov 24;30(2):344–350. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1055

Table 2.

Relative Risk Ratios (RRRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status (nSES) with Breast Cancer Subtypes

Tertile of nSES score
T1 Lowest nSES T2 Middle nSES T3 Highest nSES p-trend
Luminal A n (%) 237 (33.4) 237 (33.4) 236 (33.2)
HER2-positive n (%) 79 (34.2) 78 (33.8) 74 (32.0)
Model 11 RRR [95% CI] 1.06 [0.74–1.53] 1.05 [0.73–1.51] 1 [reference] .73
Model 22 RRR [95% CI] 1.19 [0.80–1.77] 1.13 [0.77–1.65] 1 [reference] .39
Model 33 RRR [95% CI] 1.54 [0.98–2.40] 1.38 [0.91–2.09] 1 [reference] .054
Triple-negative n (%) 110 (39.4) 102 (36.6) 67 (24.0)
Model 11 RRR [95% CI] 1.63 [1.15–2.33] 1.52 [1.06–2.17] 1 [reference] .005
Model 22 RRR [95% CI] 1.51 [1.03–2.21] 1.47 [1.02–2.14] 1 [reference] .028
Model 33 RRR [95% CI] 1.95 [1.27–2.99] 1.81 [1.20–2.71] 1 [reference] .002
1

Multilevel multinomial logistic regression models were used with luminal A as the reference group. Model 1 was a crude model.

2

Model 2 adjusted for individual-level covariates: age at diagnosis, education, household poverty level, health insurance, menopausal status, parity/age at first birth/lactation, and BMI 1 year prior to diagnosis.

3

Model 3 additionally adjusted for census tract-level proportion of Black residents.