Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;10(1):18–31. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-960

Table 4. Multivariate competing risk analysis of variables associated with recurrence in 215 radically resected patients.

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Brinkman index (>500 vs. ≤500) 0.717 (0.489–1.050) 0.088 0.729 (0.497–1.070) 0.100 0.743 (0.509–1.080) 0.120
SII (>430.8 vs. ≤430.8) 2.198 (1.258–3.840) 0.005 NA NA NA NA
NLR (>2.1 vs. ≤2.1) NA NA 1.414 (0.919–2.180) 0.120 NA NA
PLR (>122.8 vs. ≤122.8) NA NA NA NA 1.449 (0.950–2.210) 0.085
Tumor size (>5 vs. ≤5) 1.393 (0.924–2.100) 0.110 1.403 (0.930–2.120) 0.110 1.381 (0.918–2.080) 0.120
TNM stage
   II vs. I 1.230 (0.669–2.260) 0.500 1.417 (0.779–2.580) 0.250 1.309 (0.709–2.420) 0.390
   III vs. I 1.062 (0.559–2.020) 0.850 1.261 (0.682–2.330) 0.460 1.171 (0.620–2.210) 0.630
Necrosis (yes vs. no) 1.442 (1.003–2.070) 0.048 1.371 (0.951–1.980) 0.091 1.463 (1.016–2.110) 0.041
Treatment pattern (surgery ± CT ± RT vs. surgery alone) 1.525 (0.979–2.380) 0.062 1.461 (0.943–2.260) 0.090 1.504 (0.973–2.320) 0.066

NA indicates not included in the model due to interference with the three indices, SII, the NLR and the PLR. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SII, systemic inflammation-immune index; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy.