Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;7(1):e001522. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001522

Table 2.

Methodological choices in the area of ‘work outcome domains and instruments

Topics Results from studies in inflammatory arthritis (n=58) Aspects identified by authors of SLRs in other chronic diseases (n=24)
n/N* (%) Detailed information n† (%) Comments
5. Work outcome domains defined 52/58 (90%) The work outcomes domain was defined in 51 studies—n/N* (%): 13 (54%) High variability in the definition of a work outcome in included studies precluding data pooling/meta-analysis97–99 102 105–107 109 111 113 114 117 120
6. Validated measurement of sick leave 42‡/46 (91%) Of the studies that had sick leave as work outcome domain, 42 used validated instruments to assess it, n/N (%): Not reported
7. Validated measurement of presenteeism 35‡/40 (88%) Of the studies that had presenteeism as work outcome domain, 35 used validated and OMERACT endorsed instruments, n/N* (%): 1 (4%)
1 (4%)
WPAI used only in a small number of studies119
Studies use qualitative, quantitative and economic non-standardised measures of work productivity119
8. Attribution of work participation to overall health 29/58 (50%) The work outcome domain was assessed in relation to overall health (and not in relation to IA) in 46 studies, n/N* (%): Not reported
Topics Results from studies in inflammatory arthritis (n=58) Aspects identified by authors of SLRs in other chronic diseases (n=24)
n/N* (%) Detailed information n/N* (%)
9. Recall period of self-reported sick leave and presenteeism 35/42 (82%) The recall period of self-reported sick leave was ≤3 months in 34/37 (92%) studies (excluding registries as recall is not applicable)18–21 24–26 31–39 42 43 50–56 58–60 63 67–69 71 73
The recall period of self-reported presenteeism was of 7 days to 1 month in 34/40 (85%) studies18–21 24–26 31–39 42 43 50–56 58 60 62 63 67–69 71 73
1 (4%)
2 (8%)
Inconsistency of the recall period103
No accounting for a possible recall bias102 115

*The denominator may vary according to the corresponding assessed topic.

†Number of systematic literature reviews reporting on the corresponding topic.

‡Boer et al (2018) used both WPAI-RA and WPS-RA.

IA, inflammatory arthritis; n/N, number of original studies in which the methodological choice was identified/number of studies in which the topic was possible to assess; WALS, Workplace Activity Limitations Scale; WLQ-25, Work Limitations Questionnaire 25-item; WPAI, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment; WPS, Work Productivity Questionnaire.