Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 25;11:612593. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.612593

TABLE 2.

Summary likelihood assignment of parentage of 32 C. canephora trees from three families based on 120 SNP markers.

Familya Number, N Female parent
Male parent
Nf Pair LOD Probable parent Nm Pair LOD Probable parentb Trio LOD
B2 × E139 6 4 1.29–9.02 B2 0(3) 2.48–8.98 E138 13.11–45.68
H234 × H207 6 6 18.88-35.46 H234 4(2) −3.00-2.95 H207 29.54–41.88
E139 × C134 20 3 13.49-22.61 E138 1(12) Not applicable 12 clonesc 7.92–49.23

aFamilies B2 × E139 and H234 × H207 were derived through controlled crossing, whereas family E139 × C134 was obtained from the open-pollinated biclonal seed garden.

N refers to the number of individuals sampled for each family; Nf refers to the number of individuals that had the correct female parent; Nm: outside and inside brackets refer to the number of individuals that had the correct male parent in agreement with breeders’ records and the number of individuals with the probable male parent assigned by CERVUS, respectively; Pair LOD and Trio LOD denotes progeny–parent pair LOD score for probable parent matches.

bProbable parents in italics indicate pedigree that was in disagreement with breeders’ records of the parent used to generate the rest of the plants obtained from difference between the number of individuals sampled for each family (N) and number of individuals with the correct female (Nf) or male parent (Nm).

cA number of clones from nearby trials to the biclonal seed garden from which the E139 × C134 family was derived.