Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;7(2):e06074. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06074

Table 5.

Economic analysis for compost and mineral fertilizer application on maize yield.

Compost (t ha−1) Urea/NPSB (kg ha−1) AGY
Kg ha−1
ASY kg ha−1 CC (Birr ha−1) CIF (Birr ha−1) TC (Birr ha−1) GB (Birr ha−1) NB (Birr ha−1) MRR (%)
0 0 1053 4077 0 0 0 7659.9 7659.9 -
5 0 1404 5372 1100 0 1100 10200.60 9100.6 130.9
0 50 2727 8199 0 1405 1405 19365.30 17960.30 2904.8
10 0 1557 5454 2200 0 2200 11211.30 9011.3D -
5 50 3204 7965 1100 1405 2505 22419 19914 3574.6
0 100 4347 9963 0 2810 2810 30248.10 27438.10 2466.9
10 50 3960 8793 2200 1405 3605 27498.60 23893.6D -
5 100 4905 10224 1100 2810 3910 33927.30 30017.30 2007.8
10 100 5454 11295 2200 2810 5010 37710 32700 243.9

AGY = adjusted grain yield, ASY = adjusted straw yield, CC = cost of compost, CIF = cost of inorganic fertilizer, TC = total cost, GB = gross benefits, NB = net benefits, D = dominance.