Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;5(3):872–888. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003763

Table 4.

Interpretation of strong and conditional recommendations

Implications for Strong recommendation Conditional recommendation
Patients • Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action, and only a small proportion would not • The majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not
• Decision aids may be useful in helping patients to make decisions consistent with their individual risks, values, and preferences
Clinicians • Most individuals should follow the recommended course of action
• Formal decision aids are not likely to be needed to help individual patients make decisions consistent with their values and preferences
• Recognize that different choices will be appropriate for individual patients and that you must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with their values and preferences
• Decision aids may be useful in helping individuals to make decisions consistent with their individual risks, values, and preferences
Policy makers • The recommendation can be adopted as policy in most situations
• Adherence to this recommendation according to the guideline could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator
• Policymaking will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders
• Performance measures should assess whether decision-making is appropriate
Researchers • The recommendation is supported by credible research or other convincing judgments that make additional research unlikely to alter the recommendation
• On occasion, a strong recommendation is based on low or very low certainty in the evidence
• In such instances, further research may provide important information that alters the recommendations
• The recommendation is likely to be strengthened (for future updates or adaptation) by additional research
• An evaluation of the conditions and criteria (and the related judgments, research evidence, and additional considerations) that determined the conditional (rather than strong) recommendation will help identify possible research gaps