Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;286:112140. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112140

Table 3.

The technological approaches for the treatment of COVID-19 contaminated waste.

Criteria Preferred technologies
Secondary preferred technologies
Emergency solutions
Autoclave/steam sterilization Microwave Twin chamber incineration Brick built de-montfort incinerators Barrel incinerators with air induction Onsite pit burial
Condition Static or mobile Static or mobile Static or mobile Static Mobile Static
Cost Low Medium Medium Low Low Low
Scale of technology 200-10,000 L/cycle 30–500 L/cycle 50–2000 kg/h 15–50 kg 8–25 kg/h 5–10 tons of waste
Suitable for/type of waste
  • Soiled wastes

  • bedding and PPE

  • clinical laboratory waste

  • reusable instruments

  • waste sharps

  • glassware

  • Soiled wastes

  • bedding and PPE

  • clinical laboratory waste

  • reusable instruments

  • waste sharps

  • glassware

  • Soiled wastes

  • bedding and PPE

  • human anatomical wastes

  • chemical wastes

  • laboratory waste

  • Soiled wastes

  • PPE

  • Chemical and laboratory wastes

  • Soiled wastes

  • PPE

  • Chemical and laboratory wastes

  • Soiled wastes

  • PPE

  • Clinical laboratory waste

  • Disposable instruments

Pollution control Reduced air pollution Negligible to no air emissions
  • Acceptable emissions and 90% volume reduction

  • Secondary combustion chamber, temperature controls and air pollution control equipment

Negligible to air emissions Air induction cyclonic system No emission
Time of scale 30–60 min per cycle, 121–134 °C 30–250 kg/h in cycles of 30–60 min 8-h cycles receiving multiple batches of waste
High temperature (>850 °C)
6-h cycles with 1–3 batches of waste
High temperature (>850 °C)
6-h cycles with multiple batches of waste Medium temperature (>650 °C) Short
Complexity Simple Simple Mandatory training Simple Use operating manual Layers of waste with daily soil cover until full
Weakness/drawbacks
  • No volume reduction

  • Odor generation,

  • Remained waste must be landfilled

  • No volume reduction

  • Remained waste must be landfilled

  • Need regular maintenance

  • Higher capital and operational costs

  • Poor emissions if the equipment is low quality

  • Potential of formation and release of PCDD/PCDF

  • Need regular maintenance

  • Short life span (3–5 years)

  • Initial incineration will produce black smoke due to the fuel source

  • Potential of formation and release of PCDD/PCDF

  • Short life span (2–3 years)

  • The poor feedstock may lead to poor emissions

  • Potential of formation and release of PCDD/PCDF

  • Potential for leachate and releases to water and land

  • Short term solution

  • Will be fled in quickly

Application tips
  • Pair it with the shredding of material for volume reduction

  • Break down the PPE before landfilled to avoid waste picking and reuse

  • Use a HEPA filter to avoid toxic contaminants release

  • Re-bag reduced waste volumes before sending them

to landfill
  • Have a cool down cycle to enable safe ash removal

  • Encapsulate hazardous ash waste

  • Make sure emissions controls are in place

  • Use good design quality material to build a safe model.

  • Operate well to maintain acceptable emissions.

  • Avoid overloading

  • Have a cool down cycle to enable safe ash removal

  • Temporal back-up technology to ease overburden of waste materials

  • Suitable for remote sites

  • Have a cool-down cycle to enable safe ash removal

  • Fly ash easily removed

  • Secure the site from waste pickers

  • Site it away from water abstraction points, waterways, crops and communities

  • Use gauze cover to avoid vermin and odors

  • Never conduct open burning