Table 3.
The technological approaches for the treatment of COVID-19 contaminated waste.
| Criteria | Preferred technologies |
Secondary preferred technologies |
Emergency solutions |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autoclave/steam sterilization | Microwave | Twin chamber incineration | Brick built de-montfort incinerators | Barrel incinerators with air induction | Onsite pit burial | |
| Condition | Static or mobile | Static or mobile | Static or mobile | Static | Mobile | Static |
| Cost | Low | Medium | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
| Scale of technology | 200-10,000 L/cycle | 30–500 L/cycle | 50–2000 kg/h | 15–50 kg | 8–25 kg/h | 5–10 tons of waste |
| Suitable for/type of waste |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pollution control | Reduced air pollution | Negligible to no air emissions |
|
Negligible to air emissions | Air induction cyclonic system | No emission |
| Time of scale | 30–60 min per cycle, 121–134 °C | 30–250 kg/h in cycles of 30–60 min | 8-h cycles receiving multiple batches of waste High temperature (>850 °C) |
6-h cycles with 1–3 batches of waste High temperature (>850 °C) |
6-h cycles with multiple batches of waste Medium temperature (>650 °C) | Short |
| Complexity | Simple | Simple | Mandatory training | Simple | Use operating manual | Layers of waste with daily soil cover until full |
| Weakness/drawbacks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Application tips |
|
|
|
|
|
|