Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;7(2):154–164. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.194

Table 1.

The correlation between PRMT5 expression and the clinicopathological features in EAC.

Clinicopathological feature Number of patients PRMT5 expression (score) P value
0 1–4 5–12
Age (years) 0.206
≤45 10 1 4 5
>45 32 1 8 23
Myometrial invasion 0.897
<1/2 28 0 10 18
≥1/2 14 2 2 10
Cervical involvement 1.000
Uninvolved 37 2 10 25
Involved 5 0 2 3
Lymph node metastasis 0.093
39 1 11 27
+ 3 1 1 1
Adnexal metastasis 1.000
36 2 10 24
+ 6 0 2 4
ER (score) 0.007*
0–4 18 2 8 8
5–12 24 0 4 20
PR (score) 0.136
0–4 11 0 6 5
5–12 31 2 6 23
p53 0.941
Wild type (≥1 and <30%) 38 2 11 25
Wild type (≥30 and <70%) 4 0 1 3
Ki‐67 0.015*
≤30% 19 2 8 9
>30% 23 0 4 19
Grade 0.016*
G1 21 0 4 17 1.000
G2 14 0 4 10 0.017
G3 7 2 4 1 0.054 §
FIGO stage 0.762
I 32 1 9 22
II 3 0 1 2
III 7 1 2 4
IV 0 0 0 0

The expression of PRMT5 in G1, G2, and G3 EAC was compared in pairs.

*

P < 0.05.

G1 versus G2.

G2 versus G3.

§

G1 versus G3.