Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;100(5):e24559. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024559

Table 2.

AGREE II domain-standardized scores for selected CPGs and average overall quality score and overall assessment of the reviewers.

Study ID Scope and purpose (%) Stakeholders involvement (%) Rigor of development (%) Clarity of presentation (%) Applicability (%) Editorial independence (%) Overall assessment
PRMA 2005[16] 20 46 51 70 47 31 B
ACP 2008[17] 70 46 53 61 43 42 B
SACOC 2010[18] 54 41 57 76 63 47 B
CATCM 2011[19] 56 48 63 48 21 0 B
CACMS 2012[20] 33 31 45 46 32 42 B
SMS 2013[21] 46 30 39 56 31 47 B
FSR 2014[22] 59 30 58 76 39 39 B
SOS 2015[23] 59 74 53 89 67 11 B
AACE 2016[24] 85 81 60 83 69 72 A
ACR 2017[25] 65 56 42 74 39 0 B
ISOT 2017[26] 46 43 51 83 61 75 B
CATCM 2017[27] 28 35 44 65 39 8 B
CSGGM 2018[28] 54 24 44 69 54 39 B
KSBMR 2018[29] 94 37 66 61 50 0 B
KSBMR 2019[30] 28 39 12 78 58 0 C