Table 2.
AGREE II domain-standardized scores for selected CPGs and average overall quality score and overall assessment of the reviewers.
Study ID | Scope and purpose (%) | Stakeholders involvement (%) | Rigor of development (%) | Clarity of presentation (%) | Applicability (%) | Editorial independence (%) | Overall assessment |
PRMA 2005[16] | 20 | 46 | 51 | 70 | 47 | 31 | B |
ACP 2008[17] | 70 | 46 | 53 | 61 | 43 | 42 | B |
SACOC 2010[18] | 54 | 41 | 57 | 76 | 63 | 47 | B |
CATCM 2011[19] | 56 | 48 | 63 | 48 | 21 | 0 | B |
CACMS 2012[20] | 33 | 31 | 45 | 46 | 32 | 42 | B |
SMS 2013[21] | 46 | 30 | 39 | 56 | 31 | 47 | B |
FSR 2014[22] | 59 | 30 | 58 | 76 | 39 | 39 | B |
SOS 2015[23] | 59 | 74 | 53 | 89 | 67 | 11 | B |
AACE 2016[24] | 85 | 81 | 60 | 83 | 69 | 72 | A |
ACR 2017[25] | 65 | 56 | 42 | 74 | 39 | 0 | B |
ISOT 2017[26] | 46 | 43 | 51 | 83 | 61 | 75 | B |
CATCM 2017[27] | 28 | 35 | 44 | 65 | 39 | 8 | B |
CSGGM 2018[28] | 54 | 24 | 44 | 69 | 54 | 39 | B |
KSBMR 2018[29] | 94 | 37 | 66 | 61 | 50 | 0 | B |
KSBMR 2019[30] | 28 | 39 | 12 | 78 | 58 | 0 | C |