Table 3.
Rigor of development: standardized average scores in AGREE II domain for selected CPGs.
Title ID | Systematic methods used | Selecting criteria presented | Formulating the recommendations described | Benefits, side effects, and risks considered | Explicit link between the recommendations and evidence | Reviewed by external experts | Updating procedure provided |
PRMA 2005[16] | 67 | 78 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 17 | 0 |
ACP 2008[17] | 83 | 100 | 83 | 67 | 61 | 0 | 33 |
SACOC 2010[18] | 78 | 100 | 83 | 67 | 72 | 33 | 22 |
CATCM 2011[19] | 72 | 78 | 100 | 78 | 50 | 39 | 89 |
CACMS 2012[20] | 50 | 33 | 83 | 83 | 28 | 67 | 17 |
SMS 2013[21] | 83 | 72 | 94 | 0 | 17 | 33 | 11 |
FSR 2014[22] | 61 | 61 | 83 | 100 | 50 | 39 | 67 |
SOS 2015[23] | 67 | 56 | 83 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
AACE 2016[24] | 89 | 67 | 100 | 67 | 83 | 44 | 33 |
ACR 2017[25] | 67 | 44 | 50 | 44 | 78 | 39 | 17 |
ISOT 2017[26] | 61 | 78 | 83 | 67 | 83 | 39 | 0 |
CATCM 2017[27] | 50 | 67 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 6 |
CSGGM 2018[28] | 61 | 50 | 83 | 67 | 67 | 22 | 0 |
KSBMR 2018[29] | 83 | 67 | 100 | 67 | 83 | 28 | 100 |
KSBMR 2019[30] | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 17 | 0 |