Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Nov 19;40(7):839–859. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9606-6

Table 4.

Negative psychosocial functioning variables by cluster

Variable Achievement (n = 1,560) Searching moratorium (n = 1,225) Foreclosure (n = 1,215) Diffused diffusion (n = 1,278) Carefree diffusion (n = 1,061) Undifferentiated (n = 2,685) F ratio η2
Depression 51.19a (11.84) 59.28b (14.36) 49.29c (10.41) 57.33d (11.19) 55.97e (10.68) 55.56e (10.97) 136.21*** .07
General anxiety 36.60a (15.29) 46.28b (17.99) 34.80c (13.24) 45.13b (15.21) 45.39b (14.16) 42.52d (15.04) 134.27*** .07
Social anxiety 44.26a (14.12) 51.53b (15.77) 44.17a (12.60) 54.96c (14.12) 53.64c (11.28) 50.72b (12.82) 154.39*** .08
Rule breaking 15.88a (5.51) 19.09b (9.05) 15.75a (5.18) 17.44c (5.98) 22.34d (8.91) 18.26b (7.48) 147.06*** .08
Social aggression 23.77a (7.44) 26.81b (9.03) 23.14a (7.42) 25.70c (7.64) 26.86b (7.65) 25.56b (7.63) 50.38*** .03
Physical aggression 17.74a (6.21) 20.94b (8.56) 17.48a (6.13) 19.29c (6.64) 22.61d (7.68) 19.80e (7.23) 94.81*** .05

Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the sandwich estimator (Kauermann and Carroll 2001) to adjust for multilevel nesting. Overall F ratios and effect sizes are not adjusted for nesting

Within each row, means with the same subscript do not differ significantly at p < .01

***

p < .001