Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 13:1–8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000148

Table 3.

Characteristics of quality of telemedicine using the phone and online platforms

Question/response Result
n % Median Interquartile range
Counselling over the phone 216
 Previous experience with performing remote nutrition counselling
  Yes 83 38·8
  Very little 39 18·2
  No 92 43·0
 How would you compare phone nutrition counselling to usual nutrition counselling (face-to-face)?
  Superior to face-to-face counselling 7 3·3
  Similar to face-to-face counselling 53 25·2
  Inferior to face-to-face counselling 138 65·4
  Not certain 13 6·1
 Quality of counselling**
  Overall quality* 7·0 2·0
  Technical quality* 7·0 4·0
  Clinical quality* 7·0 2·0
  Organisational difficulties* 7·0 3·0
  Convenience 4·0 2·0
  Future use 3·0 4·0
 Perceived level of patient comfort in receiving remote counselling* 8·0 3·0
 Types of difficulties reported during counselling
  Technical difficulties 69 56·2
  Interpersonal communication difficulties 18 14·6
  Difficulties due to lack of anthropometric measurements 31 25·2
  Difficulties/inconvenience from conducting the session in the home environment 3 2·4
  Other 2 1·6
 Perceived level of patient comfort in receiving remote counselling* 8·0 3·0
 Perceived level of patient comfort in receiving remote counselling* 7·0 2·0
 Types of difficulties reported during counselling
  Technical difficulties 90 46·9
  Interpersonal communication difficulties 37 19·3
  Difficulties due to lack of anthropometric measurements 54 28·1
  Difficulties/inconvenience from conducting the session in the home environment 4 2·1
  Other 7 3·6
Counselling using an online platform 159
 Previous experience with performing online video nutrition counselling
  Yes 56 40·6
  Very little 20 14·5
  No 24 17·4
  I learned to use the online platforms during the coronavirus pandemic 38 27·5
 How would you compare online nutrition counselling to usual nutrition counselling (face-to-face)?
  Superior to face-to-face counselling 4 4·4
  Similar to face-to-face counselling 40 43·9
  Inferior to face-to-face counselling 44 48·4
  Not certain 3 3·3
 Quality of counselling**
  Overall quality* 8·0 2·0
  Technical quality* 7·0 2·0
  Clinical quality* 8·0 4·0
  Organisational difficulties* 7·0 6·0
  Convenience 3·0 1·0
  Future use 3·0 1·0
 Perceived level of patient comfort in receiving remote counselling* 7·0 2·0
 Types of difficulties reported during counselling
  Technical difficulties 90 46·9
  Interpersonal communication difficulties 37 19·3
  Difficulties due to lack of anthropometric measurements 54 28·1
  Difficulties/inconvenience from conducting the session in the home environment 4 2·1
  Other 7 3·6
 Perceived level of client comfort in receiving remote counselling* 8·0 3·0
 Types of difficulties reported during counselling
  Technical difficulties 69 56·2
  Interpersonal communication difficulties 18 14·6
  Difficulties due to lack of anthropometric measurements 31 25·2
  Difficulties/inconvenience from conducting the session in the home environment 3 2·4
  Other 2 1·6
*

Items scored on a ten-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, where 1 = ‘very low’ to 10 ‘very high’.

Items scored on a four-point response scale, where 1 = ‘very little’ and 4 = ‘high’.