Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;175(4):1–10. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5710

Table 2. Main Results of Associations Between PPI Use and Risk for Asthma.

Analysis PPI initiators (n = 80 870) Noninitiators (n = 80 870) Absolute risk difference in incidence (95% CI)a HR (95% CI)
No. of events Incidence ratea No. of events Incidence ratea
Primary analysis 4428 21.8 2818 14.0 7.9 (7.1-8.7) 1.57 (1.49-1.64)
Secondary analyses
Asthma definition
Diagnosis of asthma 863 4.3 561 2.8 1.5 (1.1-1.8) 1.53 (1.38-1.70)
2 Asthma drug prescription fills within 90 d 3565 17.6 2257 11.2 6.4 (5.7-7.1) 1.57 (1.49-1.66)
Timing of asthma onset (days after treatment initiation)
≤90 592 29.5 365 18.2 11.3 (8.3-14.3) 1.62 (1.42-1.85)
91-180 576 29.3 333 16.9 12.4 (9.4-15.4) 1.73 (1.52-1.98)
≥181 3260 20.0 2120 13.1 6.9 (6.0-7.8) 1.53 (1.45-1.62)
Individual drugsb
Esomeprazole 1250 52.2 777 31.8 20.4 (16.8-24.1) 1.64 (1.50-1.79)
Lansoprazole 305 37.4 204 25.1 12.2 (6.8-17.6) 1.49 (1.25-1.78)
Omeprazole 2854 16.8 1985 11.8 5.0 (4.2-5.8) 1.43 (1.35-1.51)
Pantoprazole 37 17.4 16 7.5 10.0 (3.3-16.6) 2.33 (1.30-4.18)

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

a

Calculated as events per 1000 person-years.

b

Rabeprazole was not analyzed due to small sample size (n = 6). The numbers of matched pairs of each subcohort were 11 305 for esomeprazole, 3219 for lansoprazole, 65 860 for omeprazole, and 821 for pantoprazole.