Table 3.
Item | All encounters (N = 306) | NVD (n = 106) | CS (n = 200) | Mean difference (95% confidence interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Item 1 (presenting options) | 5.03 (± 2.38) | 5.24 (± 2.88) | 4.93(± 3.03) | 0.31(-1.01,0.39) |
Item 2 (patient partnership) | 4.02 (± 2.15) | 3.96(± 2.82) | 4.05(± 2.62) | 0.09(-0.55, 0.72) |
Item 3 (describing pros/cons) | 2.48 (± 2.20) | 1.84(± 2.70) | 2.83(± 2.73) | 0.99(0.34, 1.63)* |
Item 4 (eliciting patient preferences) | 1.90 (± 2.34) | 1.32(± 2.42) | 2.20(± 3.12) | 0.88(0.19, 1.56) |
Item 5 (integrating patient preferences) | 1.49 (± 2.0) | 1.13(± 2.32) | 1.68(± 2.57) | 0.55(-0.04, 1.13) |
Total score (out of 100) | 14.92 (± 10.5) | 13.49(± 10.15) | 15.69(± 10.64) | 2.20(-0.29, 4.66) |
*p value < 0.05