Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00776-w

Table 3.

Results of logistic regression analyses predicting Aβ+ PET status

B SE z P
Favorites
 Age 0.022 0.026 0.83 .41
 Female 0.397 0.474 0.84 .40
 Education 0.074 0.084 0.88 .38
 CDR-SB 0.081 0.122 0.67 .51
 Amnestic phenotype 0.890 0.479 1.86 .06
 Time difference (yrs) 0.688 0.474 1.45 .15
 Favorites z-score − 0.673 0.196 − 3.44 < .001
Match
 Age 0.035 0.024 1.47 .14
 Female − 0.034 0.459 − 0.07 .94
 Education 0.138 0.090 1.54 .12
 CDR-SB 0.022 0.128 0.17 .86
 Amnestic phenotype 1.465 0.460 3.18 .001
 Time difference (yrs) 0.488 0.418 1.17 .24
 Match z-score − 0.521 0.136 − 3.82 < .001
Line Orientation
 Age 0.024 0.023 1.04 .30
 Female 0.266 0.428 0.62 .53
 Education 0.099 0.084 1.18 .24
 CDR-SB 0.184 0.112 1.64 .10
 Amnestic phenotype 1.475 0.442 3.34 < .001
 Time difference (yrs) 0.571 0.439 1.30 .19
 Line Orientation z-score − 0.257 0.136 − 1.89 .06
BHS-ECog
 Age − 0.001 0.027 − 0.01 .99
 Female 0.496 0.465 1.07 .29
 Education 0.074 0.083 0.89 .38
 CDR-SB 0.076 0.134 0.57 .57
 Amnestic phenotype 1.295 0.486 2.66 .008
 Time difference (yrs) 0.419 0.426 0.98 .33
 BHS-ECog Score 0.864 0.398 2.17 .03

Abbreviations: B log odds, BHS-ECog Brain Health Survey Everyday Cognition Scales, CDR-SB Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes, MCI mild cognitive impairment, PET positron emission tomography, SE standard error, yrs. years