Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;38(1):e08. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v38n1e08

Table 3. The participants’ perspective on the criteria for evaluating health websites.

Questions Not important n (%) A little important n (%) Somewhat important n (%) Important n (%) Very important n (%)
Protecting users’ personal information 17 (4.4) 24 (6.2) 46 (11.9) 117 (30.3) 182 (47.2)
Information in my language 9 (2.3) 18 (4.7) 56 (14.5) 157 (40.7) 146 (37.8)
Updated information 3 (0.8) 11 (2.9) 24 (6.3) 86 (22.5) 259 (67.6)
Interaction (such as answering / chat / chat services) 17 (4.5) 28 (7.4) 99 (26.1) 123 (32.4) 113 (29.7)
The presence of healthcare professionals 9 (2.4) 24 (6.3) 48 (12.7) 116 (30.6) 182 (28)
Clarity of site officials and sponsors 49 (12.8) 47 (12.3) 106 (27.7) 81 (21.2) 99 (25.9)
The proper design of the site 13 (4.7) 61 (15.9) 113 (29.5) 109 (28.5) 82 (21.4)
Link to other sites 28 (7.3) 59 (15.4) 116 (30.2) 114 (29.7) 67 (17.4)
Specialized resources 7 (1.8) 19 (5) 57 (14.9) 144 (37.6) 156 (49.7)
Approved by a physician 11 (2.9) 23 (6) 56 (14.5) 104 (27) 191 (49.6)
Recommended by a friend or family member 49 (12.8) 95 (24.7) 131 (34.1) 66 (17.2) 43 (11.2)