Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;23:7. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00697-x

Table 2.

Inter-modality agreement

Aorta levels Area (cm2) Circumference (mm) Diameter (mm)
CTA CMRA ICC CTA CMRA ICC CTA CMRA ICC
Sinus 11.8 ± 2.8 12.0 ± 2.7 0.96 127.6 ± 14.7 130.8 ± 15.7 0.92 39.2 ± 4.9 41.0 ± 5.0 0.90
Sinotubular junction 10.4 ± 2.0 10.4 ± 2.0 0.90 115.5 ± 11.1 116.7 ± 12.1 0.90 36.5 ± 3.5 37.0 ± 3.8 0.89
Mid ascending aorta 14.1 ± 2.6 14.2 ± 2.5 0.94 133.5 ± 13.7 135.7 ± 12.9 0.90 42.3 ± 4.2 43.1 ± 4.2 0.93
Proximal arch 11.4 ± 2.6 11.6 ± 2.7 0.93 120.5 ± 14.3 123.0 ± 14.7 0.86 38.1 ± 4.5 39.1 ± 4.8 0.91
Mid arch 7.7 ± 2.0 7.3 ± 2.0 0.91 98.6 ± 12.4 97.6 ± 13.0 0.94 31.3 ± 4.0 31.1 ± 4.0 0.94
Proximal descending aorta 6.2 ± 1.3 6.0 ± 1.2 0.92 89.0 ± 9.7 88.9 ± 9.1 0.90 28.1 ± 3.1 28.1 ± 3.0 0.84
Mid descending aorta 6.2 ± 3.2 6.1 ± 2.6 0.96 88.0 ± 19.5 87.6 ± 16.7 0.97 27.8 ± 6.2 28.1 ± 5.5 0.97

Area, circumference and diameter measurements on CTA and CMRA at different levels of the thoracic aorta. Data are reported as means with standard deviation. Inter-modality agreement is shown with ICC values

CTA computed tomography angiography, CMRA cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography, ICC intra-class correlation coefficient