Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 29;9:342. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_558_20

Table 1.

Students’ response to the questionnaire (frequency distribution (%) and response frequency)

Close-ended questions SD (%) D (%) N (%) A (%) SA (%) Rating average Response count
E-class link works properly and learners able to navigate easily 8 (4.2) 15 (7.9) 58 (30.7) 72 (38.1) 36 (19) 3.60 189
Online teaching fulfills your learning objectives 6 (3.2) 21 (11.1) 54 (28.6) 78 (41.3) 30 (15.9) 3.56 189
The material presented clearly and understandable 2 (1.1) 16 (8.5) 44 (23.3) 78 (41.3) 49 (25.9) 3.86 189
Faculty speech was clear and audible 5 (2.6) 29 (15.3) 62 (32.8) 62 (32.8) 31 (16.4) 3.45 189
The resource materials provided for online learning were sufficient and adequate 4 (2.1) 10 (5.3) 42 (22.2) 83 (43.9) 50 (26.5) 3.87 189
The teaching methods and medias for online teaching were appropriate with optimum utilization 4 (2.1) 10 (5.3) 64 (33.9) 71 (37.6) 40 (21.2) 3.70 189
Time allocated for the online teaching was adequate 3 (1.6) 11 (5.8) 44 (23.3) 75 (39.7) 56 (29.6) 3.90 189
Online learning more develop interest and motivation in learning 15 (7.9) 11 (5.8) 61 (32.3) 59 (31.2) 43 (22.8) 3.55 189
Learners found online learning technology easy to use 5 (2.6) 14 (7.4) 54 (28.6) 67 (35.4) 49 (25.9) 3.75 189
Online learning was very effective method for learning in comparison with face-to-face learning 27 (14.3) 31 (16.4) 60 (31.7) 41 (21.7) 30 (15.9) 3.08 189

SD=Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, N=Neutral, A=Agree, SA=Strongly agree